50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 2009
DOI: 10.2514/6.2009-2128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a Smart Droop Nose as Leading Edge High Lift System for Transportation Aircrafts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1b shows some representative examples, including a linear spring, a linear spring with a vertical offset, and a stiffening spring. Loads of this form would be expected for morphing aircraft concepts such as compliant leading or trailing edge camber changes, 20,21,22,23,24 elastic span extension, 25,26 warp induced variable twist, 27 and chord extension, 28 The impact of the mismatch in force profiles between actuator and load is a reduction in achievable deflection and a loss of efficiency, requiring more input energy and a larger, heavier actuator to perform a given task. Actuators convert energy input into force and displacement available.…”
Section: Actuator and Load Force Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1b shows some representative examples, including a linear spring, a linear spring with a vertical offset, and a stiffening spring. Loads of this form would be expected for morphing aircraft concepts such as compliant leading or trailing edge camber changes, 20,21,22,23,24 elastic span extension, 25,26 warp induced variable twist, 27 and chord extension, 28 The impact of the mismatch in force profiles between actuator and load is a reduction in achievable deflection and a loss of efficiency, requiring more input energy and a larger, heavier actuator to perform a given task. Actuators convert energy input into force and displacement available.…”
Section: Actuator and Load Force Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wing level Maute and Reich 21 Material-based topology optimization 12.3 2.1 Simulation Vasista et al 29 Load-path topology optimization method 10.1 À6.8 /þ8.0 Wing level Smart Droop Nose 26 Traditional rigid-body mechanisms 20 -Wing level DARPA 51 Eccentuator and piezomotor-based actuation -+20…”
Section: Aerodynamic Analysis Of Leading-edge Deflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ability to modify the airfoil shape is still one of the promising technology, due to its potential capability to optimize selected aircraft performance index during the mission, like for example fuel burning. Of special interest are the concepts focused on variable camber leading edge [10,11], trailing edge [12,13] and full profile [14,15]. Nevertheless, the design of this kind of devices does not represent an easy task and would require the availability of ad-hoc developed procedures able to tackle the conflicting requirements such as the high deformability requested to change the airfoil shape coupled to the load carrying capability and low weight.…”
Section: Design Manufacturing and Wind Tunnel Test Of A Morphing Winmentioning
confidence: 99%