2020 11th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icccnt49239.2020.9225501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a Two-Bit Magnitude Comparator Based on Pass Transistor, Transmission Gate and Conventional Static CMOS Logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Table 1, PDP for CMOS and PTL are close. This is also consistent with the result obtained in [15] where they achieve lower PDP when designing a CNTFET-based comparator using PTL as compared to the CMOS approach. The most striking difference is achieved for 2:1 MUX using the GDI approach.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…According to Table 1, PDP for CMOS and PTL are close. This is also consistent with the result obtained in [15] where they achieve lower PDP when designing a CNTFET-based comparator using PTL as compared to the CMOS approach. The most striking difference is achieved for 2:1 MUX using the GDI approach.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Due to the massive advancement in electronic device technologies in terms of speed, feature size reduction and complexity (Lubaba et al 2020;Mahdi et al 2020;Hasan et al 2020), intelligent, automated and smart systems have evolved in order to make human life easier and comfortable (Osman et al 2017;Shammi et al 2018). Nowadays, massive automation works have been going on in various fields in order to solve real-life problems by means of automated devices and systems ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the design and performance parameters presented in Table 1, it can be observed that QCA FA in [69] has the lowest cell count (22). QCA FA in [81] utilized only 1 more cell than QCA FA in [64]. Moreover, QCA FAs in [66-68, 71, 72] have a low cell count.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In circuit design, it becomes necessary to have a comparison of the performance parameters [80][81][82][83]. Based on the performance comparison parameters of QCA FAs discussed above, a summary is provided in Table 1.…”
Section: Design and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%