AIAA International Air and Space Symposium and Exposition: The Next 100 Years 2003
DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-2785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Aircraft Structure for High Durability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, for fail-safe involving surface flaws, an initial damage of 1.27 mm (3.18 mm for slow-flaw growth) is assumed for pre-service inspections with high standard NDT, while 6.35 mm is assumed for in-service inspections. In structural applications of aluminium alloy panels in aircraft, the most common NDT method for crack monitoring is General Visual Inspection (GVI) [8]. For GVI, the length of the detectable crack ranges from 5.08 to 12.70 mm.…”
Section: Dimensions Of the Studied Cracksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, for fail-safe involving surface flaws, an initial damage of 1.27 mm (3.18 mm for slow-flaw growth) is assumed for pre-service inspections with high standard NDT, while 6.35 mm is assumed for in-service inspections. In structural applications of aluminium alloy panels in aircraft, the most common NDT method for crack monitoring is General Visual Inspection (GVI) [8]. For GVI, the length of the detectable crack ranges from 5.08 to 12.70 mm.…”
Section: Dimensions Of the Studied Cracksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among methods to design the residual strength of structures damaged by WFD is one developed at TsAGI. Figure 4 demonstrates the approach to calculate the residual strength of the structure that is composed of four sequentially failed components with different cross section areas ratio F 1 :F 2 :F 3 :F 4 [8]. The residual strength of the multipart structure is varied step-by-step depending on the relative damaged area.…”
Section: Widespread Fatigue Damages and Multiple Site Damages In Airc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MSD happens mainly in longitudinal skin joints of pressurized fuselages structures. The fracture parameters in case of WFD and MSD are given in paper [1], [8] for Russian airplanes.…”
Section: Widespread Fatigue Damages and Multiple Site Damages In Airc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial specimen cut was through the central primary stiffener, adjacent pad-up, and skin containment features. This is representative of aerospace testing procedures where crack propagation from a damaged stiffener across two adjacent skin bays is a critical design case [34]. The non-prismatic specimen, FCG-E was given a second pre-damage site, located within the skin bay, adjacent to an outer primary stiffener and centralized between a set of off-axis buckling containment features (Fig.…”
Section: Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%