2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11265-007-0115-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of an H.264/AVC Decoder with Memory Hierarchy and Line-Pixel-Lookahead

Abstract: Abstract. This paper describes a novel memory hierarchy and line-pixel-lookahead (LPL) for an H.264/AVC video decoder. The memory system is the bottleneck of most video processors, particularly in the newly announced H.264/AVC. This is because it utilizes the neighboring pixels to create a reliable predictor, leading to a dependency on a long past history of data. This problem can be resolved by allocating memory space but inducing large silicon area and power consumption as well. We first review the existing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This way, the fixed architecture's datapath was tuned to operate with maximum parallelism considering only full sampling. A similar approach is presented in [42], where specific fixed architectures are presented for sampling ratios other than 1:1.…”
Section: Sad Configurable Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This way, the fixed architecture's datapath was tuned to operate with maximum parallelism considering only full sampling. A similar approach is presented in [42], where specific fixed architectures are presented for sampling ratios other than 1:1.…”
Section: Sad Configurable Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical design decision is to determine the size of the on-chip memory and decide which part of reference data should be stored. Design [25] proposed a Line-Pixel-Lookahead scenario to predict the size of the buffer.…”
Section: Poc (Partial-on-chip)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) For PoC scheme, we assume 1/8 memory size compared with FoC, and 60% missing rate according to [25].…”
Section: Poc (Partial-on-chip)mentioning
confidence: 99%