2021 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things Engineering (ICBAIE) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icbaie52039.2021.9389935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of an intelligent medical splint with 3D printing and pressure detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional areas of research include medical sensor design [14][15][16][17][18], body area networks [19,20], and WBANs [21][22][23]. This paper's unique contribution lies in a comprehensive review of physical layer (PHY) technologies in WBANs, highlighting testbed implementations, and providing an end-to-end overview of M2M systems within mHealth contexts.…”
Section: M2m Technologies With Application To Bci and Eegmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional areas of research include medical sensor design [14][15][16][17][18], body area networks [19,20], and WBANs [21][22][23]. This paper's unique contribution lies in a comprehensive review of physical layer (PHY) technologies in WBANs, highlighting testbed implementations, and providing an end-to-end overview of M2M systems within mHealth contexts.…”
Section: M2m Technologies With Application To Bci and Eegmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Li et al [29] presented a model of a smart splint manufactured using 3D printing techniques that can sense the changing pressure in the fracture area in order to detect the area of looseness in the cast and display the results on a screen attached to the splint. This splint can also measure the temperature in all cast areas through a temperature sensor that connects the cast to the patient's skin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CV-based systems have the advantages of simple equipment and low cost, vision algorithms are inevitably accompanied by the shortcomings of being highly influenced by occlusions and light. More critically, CV-based systems have a single source of data (only image pixel information) and therefore lack the means to robustly monitor the patient’s physiological parameters (e.g., pressure on the affected area), yet the tightness of the splints used for immobilization is an important influence on the outcome of fracture rehabilitation ( Li et al, 2021 ). Therefore, the lack of capability of CV-based systems in this area is the greatest drawback compared to sensor-based rehabilitation training systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%