2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2016.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of an Internal Model Control strategy for single-phase grid-connected PWM inverters and its performance analysis with a non-linear local load and weak grid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Good results were obtained by Chaves et al [21] when inverting the order of calculation of L 2 and L 1 presented in [20]. Therefore, the value of the coupling inductance ( L 2 ) can be determined as (6).…”
Section: Analysis and Operation Of The Dc–ac Bidirectional Output Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good results were obtained by Chaves et al [21] when inverting the order of calculation of L 2 and L 1 presented in [20]. Therefore, the value of the coupling inductance ( L 2 ) can be determined as (6).…”
Section: Analysis and Operation Of The Dc–ac Bidirectional Output Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These controllers are widely used for their simple structure, low cost and ease of implementation, however, they cannot compensate the steady‐state error in the term of sinusoidal input [10]. Recently, discrete control strategies like repetitive control [11–14], internal model control [15], sliding‐mode control [16–18] and dead beat control [19–21] has been proposed for inverters. One of the advantages of repetitive control is the minimum output harmonic distortion of the load but it consists of some limitations including: slow dynamics, large memory capacity, poor tracking and poor performance to different disturbances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the mathematical model is different from the actual object, it not only fails to achieve good control effect, but also reduces the output performance and endangers the safe operation of the converter [13]. Compared with other controllers, repetitive control has the following advantages: its repeatability can be used to achieve harmonic suppression of periodic interference signals [14], [15]; it has good steady-state performance, and can theoretically realize no static error tracking [16]. However, its dynamic performance and performance in suppressing non-periodic interference are not good.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%