2017
DOI: 10.1587/transinf.2017edl8061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Closed-Loop Fuzzy FES Controller and Tests in Controlling Knee Extension Movements

Abstract: SUMMARYFuzzy controller can be useful to realize a practical closed-loop FES controller, because it is possible to make it easy to design FES controller and to determine its parameter values, especially for controlling multi-joint movements by stimulating many muscles including antagonistic muscle pairs. This study focused on using fuzzy controller for the closed-loop control of cycling speed during FES cycling with pedaling wheelchair. However, a designed fuzzy controller has to be tested experimentally in co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, a closed-loop fuzzy FES controller was developed based on our previous study and a prototype of closed-loop FES control system for mobile FES cycling with the pedaling wheelchair was examined. Since FES control of mobile cycling depended on cycling system and there was no continuous time closed-loop FES controller for mobile cycling, a fuzzy controller was tested in controlling knee extension angle comparing to PID controller [17] and the developed prototype system was not compared with other control systems. Then, although ankle joint was controlled by FES during cycling without a orthotic brace, a closed-loop control for the ankle joint was not implemented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, a closed-loop fuzzy FES controller was developed based on our previous study and a prototype of closed-loop FES control system for mobile FES cycling with the pedaling wheelchair was examined. Since FES control of mobile cycling depended on cycling system and there was no continuous time closed-loop FES controller for mobile cycling, a fuzzy controller was tested in controlling knee extension angle comparing to PID controller [17] and the developed prototype system was not compared with other control systems. Then, although ankle joint was controlled by FES during cycling without a orthotic brace, a closed-loop control for the ankle joint was not implemented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this study was to develop a prototype of closed-loop FES control system of cycling speed with the pedaling wheelchair and to test control performance of the controller in mobile FES cycling. First, a continuous time closed-loop fuzzy FES controller for cycling speed control was designed based on the fuzzy FES controller tested in knee extension angle control [17]. Since the controlled variable was different from the previous controller, control performance of the developed fuzzy controller had to be examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Li et al (2017) [25] system settled with a little bit higher steady-state error (2 • ) compared to the FLC HDL system, which settled at a good steady-state error of 0.4 • and an overshoot of 1.2 • . For the reference angle of 20 • , the Watanabe et al (2017) [28] system performed with a relatively similar rise time and settling time but a higher steady-state error (0.6 • ) compared to the FLC HDL, which settled at 0.3 • to 0.4 • steady-state errors (for 40 • and 30 • reference angles). In comparison to all other developed systems, both the developed modelled FLC (FLC MAT) and the digital FLC (FLC HDL) are able to achieve low steady-state errors (0.3 • to 0.4 • ) and low system overshoot (1.2 • to 1.4 • ).…”
Section: System Level Verification (Hdl Co-simulation)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The performance of the designed digital FLC (FLC HDL) was further investigated and compared with other feedback controllers reported by other researchers, which include Benahmed et al (2017) [59], Lynch and Popovic (2012) [1], Li et al (2017) [25] and Watanabe et al (2017) [28]. Table 8 shows the key performance characteristics of the knee trajectory response, such as rise time, settling time, overshoot and steady-state error.…”
Section: System Level Verification (Hdl Co-simulation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation