2011 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/aim.2011.6027017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of experiments for calibration of planar anthropomorphic manipulators

Abstract: -The paper presents a novel technique for the design of optimal calibration experiments for a planar anthropomorphic manipulator with n degrees of freedom. Proposed approach for selection of manipulator configurations allows essentially improving calibration accuracy and reducing parameter identification errors. The results are illustrated by application examples that deal with typical anthropomorphic manipulators.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

6
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be shown that here it is not reasonable to use the A-criterion (the goal of A-criterion is to minimize the trace of the covariance matrix) because the trace of the relevant information matrix does not depend on the plan of experiments. Further, it was proved that the criteria that operate with the covariance matrix determinant (D and D* criteria, [8]; the goal of D-criterion is to minimize the determinant of the covariance matrix, the goal of D*-criterion is to ensure independence of the identified parameters and to minimize the determinant of the covariance matrix that is diagonal) lead to minimization of only. Corresponding loss of the accuracy is presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Test-pose Based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be shown that here it is not reasonable to use the A-criterion (the goal of A-criterion is to minimize the trace of the covariance matrix) because the trace of the relevant information matrix does not depend on the plan of experiments. Further, it was proved that the criteria that operate with the covariance matrix determinant (D and D* criteria, [8]; the goal of D-criterion is to minimize the determinant of the covariance matrix, the goal of D*-criterion is to ensure independence of the identified parameters and to minimize the determinant of the covariance matrix that is diagonal) lead to minimization of only. Corresponding loss of the accuracy is presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Test-pose Based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of the covariance matrix or information matrix (its inverse) [1]. In [5] the authors proposed an optimality condition of the calibration plan where the main idea is to ensure that the information matrix is diagonal. This condition corresponds to the D-optimal plan of experiments and is satisfied when…”
Section: Problem Of Measurement Pose Selection In Robot Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, for n = 2, m ≥ 2 expressions (4) provide two simple constraints only ∑ m k=1 cos q k 2 = 0 , ∑ m k=1 sin q k 2 = 0, which are imposed on the 2m design variables q k 1 , q k 2 | k = 1, m . So, relevant configurations can be easily found geometrically [5]. However, even in the case of n = 3, m ≥ 3 there are 6 rather complicated trigonometric constraints imposed on 3m design variables q k 1 , q k 2 , q k 3 | k = 1, m .…”
Section: Problem Of Measurement Pose Selection In Robot Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daney [53] used the constrained optimization algorithm based on the minimization of the singular values product for Gough platform calibration. In [54], the idea from D-optimality criteria has been used to quantify optimal measurement configurations for a general nR planar manipulators. Zhuang et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%