2015 3rd RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICROM) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icrom.2015.7367827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Model Predictive Control of two-wheeled inverted pendulum robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the mechanical system, smooth responses without oscillations are always expected in order to avoid damaging parts; the proposed structure has lesser oscillations compared to the PID controller-based IP system in [65] due to the presence of LQR in the feedback path. Due to the presence of the reference model, the error also under control in the proposed work compared to the MPC-based IP system presented in [66].…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the mechanical system, smooth responses without oscillations are always expected in order to avoid damaging parts; the proposed structure has lesser oscillations compared to the PID controller-based IP system in [65] due to the presence of LQR in the feedback path. Due to the presence of the reference model, the error also under control in the proposed work compared to the MPC-based IP system presented in [66].…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MPC design was done based on the design given in Minouchehr and Hosseini-Sani. 22 The angular position and angular velocity were constrained to 0.1° and 10 r/min, respectively. The control and prediction horizons were considered as 40, the sampling time was 0.01 s, and the weighting symmetric matrices were selected as …”
Section: Evaluation and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fiacchini et al [2] proposed linear and nonlinear controllers for stabilizing a personal pendulum vehicle. To compensate for the measurable disturbances, the work in [3] compared the performance of Model Predictive Controller and LQR. Multipoint pole placement control for velocity tracking of the TWIP is shown in [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%