2009
DOI: 10.1145/1556134.1556140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of multimedia surveillance systems

Abstract: This article addresses the problem of how to select the optimal combination of sensors and how to determine their optimal placement in a surveillance region in order to meet the given performance requirements at a minimal cost for a multimedia surveillance system. We propose to solve this problem by obtaining a performance vector, with its elements representing the performances of subtasks, for a given input combination of sensors and their placement. Then we show that the optimal sensor selection problem can … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linear programming, coverage (Sivaram et al 2009;Bottino et al 2009 Marchand and Chaumette 1999b) Object modeling Next best view (Banta et al 2000;Chen and Li 2005;Pito 1999) Object modeling Information entropy,rule based (Li and Liu 2005;Kutulakos and Dyer 1995) Recognition Optimal visibility (de Ruiter et al 2010) Recognition Probabilistic (Farshidi et al 2009;Roy et al 2005) Path planning Roadmap (Baumann et al 2008;Zhang et al 2009) General Random occlusion (Mittal and Davis 2008) Camera-lighting Geometrical (Marchand 2007) Multirobot formation Graph theory (Kaminka et al 2008)…”
Section: Representative Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear programming, coverage (Sivaram et al 2009;Bottino et al 2009 Marchand and Chaumette 1999b) Object modeling Next best view (Banta et al 2000;Chen and Li 2005;Pito 1999) Object modeling Information entropy,rule based (Li and Liu 2005;Kutulakos and Dyer 1995) Recognition Optimal visibility (de Ruiter et al 2010) Recognition Probabilistic (Farshidi et al 2009;Roy et al 2005) Path planning Roadmap (Baumann et al 2008;Zhang et al 2009) General Random occlusion (Mittal and Davis 2008) Camera-lighting Geometrical (Marchand 2007) Multirobot formation Graph theory (Kaminka et al 2008)…”
Section: Representative Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Hörster and Lienhart, 2006a;Hörster and Lienhart, 2006b;Hörster and Lienhart, 2006c) proposed a linear programming approach that determines the calibration for each camera in the network that maximizes the coverage of the observable space with a certain resolution. (Ram et al, 2006;Sivaram et al, 2009) proposed a performance metric that evaluates the probability of accomplishing a task as a function of set of camera configurations. This metric took into consideration the objects of interest in the scenario and was defined to realize only images obtained in a certain direction (frontal image of the person).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although (Bodor et al, 2007;Janoos et al, 2007) proposed the use of observed human activity for optimizing the camera placement, in the proposed work the human trajectories are simulated and not observed in order to identify regions with dominant human activity. Furthermore, (Ram et al, 2006;Sivaram et al, 2009) proposed the use of frontal view from observations as a task for optimizing the camera position unlike the proposed method that predicts frontal view based on human behavior. Finally, the human behavior in a given scenario is influenced by the 3D geometry of that environment (Mantini and Shah, 2014;Kitani et al, 2012).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many recent works have been proposed for enhancing event monitoring performance, including multimedia coding [2][3][4], event coverage [5][6][7], and event detection [8][9][10]. For multimedia coding-related works, as it relates to the transmission and exchange of large amounts of data, in addition to computation-intensive features, it also has resource-demanding features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%