2014
DOI: 10.2478/acsc-2014-0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Of Multivariable Fractional Order Pid Controller Using Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here are presented the results of the developed system. Since evolution strategies are comparable to reinforcement learning methods (Salimans et al, 2017), we will compare this method to reinforcement learning methods using the negative amplitude of lateral and angular errors as its rewards, and a constant gain method trained using CMA-ES on the same objective function as the proposed method, similarly to existing methods (Wakasa et al, 2010;Sivananaithaperumal and Baskar, 2014;Marova, 2016). Tests are focused on the trained system and not on the training phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here are presented the results of the developed system. Since evolution strategies are comparable to reinforcement learning methods (Salimans et al, 2017), we will compare this method to reinforcement learning methods using the negative amplitude of lateral and angular errors as its rewards, and a constant gain method trained using CMA-ES on the same objective function as the proposed method, similarly to existing methods (Wakasa et al, 2010;Sivananaithaperumal and Baskar, 2014;Marova, 2016). Tests are focused on the trained system and not on the training phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appropriateness of the proposed variants of the SOA in designing the FOPI controller is also compared with other global optimization techniques (DE [11] and CMAES [12]) and popular classical local search techniques (Nelder-Mead simplex search (NM-SS) [9] and interior point method (IPM) [10]) in Table 3. It can be observed that the CSOA outperforms the other algorithms under consideration, while the ESOA is better than the other algorithms except for the CSOA and is comparable to DE.…”
Section: Soamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obtain the personal best position, neighborhood best position and population best position Determine the search direction and step size of individual seeker by adopting chaotic behavior using (19) Based on search direction & step size, update the position of individual seeker using (12) Evaluate the objective function for each of the updated seekers Evaluate and update position for personal best, subpopulation best and over-all best…”
Section: Start Random Initialization Of Seeker Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations