2016
DOI: 10.7236/ijasc.2016.5.2.73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Optical Biological Sensor for Phycocyanin Parameters Measurement using Fluorescence Technique

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…36,37 PC is excited between 590 and 630 nm and emits between 650 and 660 nm. 33,38 This is sufficiently different from Chl-a 20,39,40 to allow selective detection. Thus, PC allows the detection of cyanobacteria even in mixed phytoplankton assemblages.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…36,37 PC is excited between 590 and 630 nm and emits between 650 and 660 nm. 33,38 This is sufficiently different from Chl-a 20,39,40 to allow selective detection. Thus, PC allows the detection of cyanobacteria even in mixed phytoplankton assemblages.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the low specificity of Chl- a , alternative fluorescent pigments have been proposed as selective cyanobacteria indicators. Phycocyanin (PC) has been the first option due to its high specificity to cyanobacteria (it is only present in this and few other species). , PC is excited between 590 and 630 nm and emits between 650 and 660 nm. , This is sufficiently different from Chl- a ,, to allow selective detection. Thus, PC allows the detection of cyanobacteria even in mixed phytoplankton assemblages. , Based on the latter, several PC fluorescence-based sensors have already been developed, such as the submersible field probes YSI 6600 and TriOS, ,, which can analyze cyanobacteria at different depth levels, or sensor systems with multiple fluorescence channels for more precise spectroscopic analysis. ,, Despite their selectivity even in real samples, the main drawback of all these systems is their limit of detection (LoD), typically above 10 3 cell·mL –1 , where the initial stage of the bloom already takes place.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%