SAE Technical Paper Series 1981
DOI: 10.4271/811302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Thin Walled Columns for Crash Energy Management — Their Strength and Mode of Collapse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous experimental studies have indicated that the crush energy absorbed by tubes varies approximately as the tube thickness raised to the 1.6 to 1.8 power [3,4]. We have studied this phenomenon with our DYNA3D finite-element code and found this trend to be duplicated numerically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Previous experimental studies have indicated that the crush energy absorbed by tubes varies approximately as the tube thickness raised to the 1.6 to 1.8 power [3,4]. We have studied this phenomenon with our DYNA3D finite-element code and found this trend to be duplicated numerically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The hat shaped members and the thin-walled members mostly used for the vehicle structural member designed to go through proper plastic deformation at the time of collision, so as to restrain the passenger space from being deformed and thus to protect the passengers Jones and Weirzbicki, 1993 Studies about energy absorption of the structural members so far have induced the theoretical formulas about mean collapse stress with regard to the collapse behavior under the static load and those about mean collapse strength in consideration of the absorption energy by the movement of plastic hinge, and have performed tests and comparisons accordingly (Aya and Takhashi, 1974;Mahood and Paluzny, 1981). Other studies suggested geometric models for accordion-shaped collapse folds, and calculated the static mean collapse load by energy equilibrium condition.…”
Section: Instructionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To prevent the paneling collapse of square box columns of mild-and high-strength steels, the compactness criterion (Mahmood and Paluszny, 1981) assumes a plate-type column under uniform axial compression and requires that the critical elastic local buckling stress be greater than the maximum (crippling) load-carrying strength of the component. In terms of a thickness and cross-sectional width ratio, t/b is required to be greater than or equal to {0.48[r y (1 À m 2 )/E] 1/2 }, where t is the wall thickness; b is the width of the ''buckling'' plate (same units as t); r y is the yield strength of the material; m is Poisson's ratio; and E is the modulus of elasticity (same units as r y ).…”
Section: Design Criteria For Axial Crushmentioning
confidence: 99%