2011 Design, Automation &Amp; Test in Europe 2011
DOI: 10.1109/date.2011.5763154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of voltage-scalable meta-functions for approximate computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to an exponent subtractor, the mantissa adder offers a larger design space for inexact design, because the number of bits in the mantissa adder is significantly larger than the exponent subtractor. As shown in Table 1, the number of mantissa bits is larger than the number of exponent bits [7] .For the IEEE single precision format, the exponent subtractor is an 8-bit adder, while the mantissa adder is a 25-bit adder (for two24-bit significances). Furthermore, the inexact design in the mantissa adder has a lower impact on the error than its exponent counterpart in the lower data range, because the mantissa part is less significant than the exponent part.…”
Section: Mantissa Addermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to an exponent subtractor, the mantissa adder offers a larger design space for inexact design, because the number of bits in the mantissa adder is significantly larger than the exponent subtractor. As shown in Table 1, the number of mantissa bits is larger than the number of exponent bits [7] .For the IEEE single precision format, the exponent subtractor is an 8-bit adder, while the mantissa adder is a 25-bit adder (for two24-bit significances). Furthermore, the inexact design in the mantissa adder has a lower impact on the error than its exponent counterpart in the lower data range, because the mantissa part is less significant than the exponent part.…”
Section: Mantissa Addermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An inexact fixed-point adder has been extensively studied and can be used in the exponent adder inexact adders such as lower-part-OR adders (LOA) [3], approximate mirror adders [4], approximate XOR/XNORbased adders, and equal segmentation adders [6], [7] can be found in the literature [1,2,3]. For a fast FP adder, a revised LOA adder is used, because it significantly reduces the critical path by ignoring the lower carry bits.…”
Section: Exponent Subtractormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The approximate adders could be broadly categorized into two types. The first type is due to the impact of timinginduced errors when a n bit ripple carry adder (RCA) is divided into several k-bit sub-adders (k < n), e.g., [2,3,4,5]. These designs cut the carry propagation chain to induce some errors to approximately calculate the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in audio and image processing or in wireless communication, it might be desirable to get better performance (faster, smaller, less powerhungry systems) at expenses of some quality degradation. Recently, a few papers have addressed this issue of designing imprecise hardware to save power [1], [2], [3], [4]. In this work, we introduce a systematic way of having imprecise arithmetic operations for the two most common operations: addition and multiplication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%