Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2858036.2858148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Opportunities in Three Stages of Relationship Development between Users and Self-Tracking Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Kim et al [32] note that even after tracking has finished or stagnated, many people sought to keep or control access to their data. Lazar et al [33] report on those who continued tracking, hoping for future potential use of their data, even when it was no longer useful for them.…”
Section: Documenting Everyday Life With Quantified Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Kim et al [32] note that even after tracking has finished or stagnated, many people sought to keep or control access to their data. Lazar et al [33] report on those who continued tracking, hoping for future potential use of their data, even when it was no longer useful for them.…”
Section: Documenting Everyday Life With Quantified Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For researchers looking to study or design for long-term tracking, Jasmin's story highlights some challenges for long-term tracking: (1) persistent data access over a long period of time on one platform is nearly impossible, (2) frequently changing goals are not necessarily compatible with one device hence multiple devices may be needed, (3) emotional bonds with devices [26] can influence device choice and abandonment, and ( 4) "old" data can be wished for years later, taking extreme measures to preserve it and seeking out ways to integrate it with new practices or simply to reminisce.…”
Section: Jasmin: a Story Of Multiple Trackersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some designs and tools have used guided self-experimentation to lower the burden of identifying what to track [59,127,163]. Publications have examined the general strategies people take to find an appropriate tool (e.g., asking friends for advice, looking at online reviews [77]) and challenges people face in evaluating tools [138,217]. Although flexible configuration can help ensure tools are effective (e.g., OmniTrack [143], paper-based methods [12]), we found few studies of how people go about deciding whether a tool is a good fit or systems which help support this decision.…”
Section: Model Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 publications discussed questions of privacy in the context of data ownership. Publications questioned whether individuals or device and app developers own the rights to self-tracked data [138,231], expressed concern that a company may make tracked data public in the future [116,152], or examined how designs do or can support data access control [231,263,281]. Other publications examined privacy and ethical tensions and potential benefits around data donation, where researchers could leverage contributed self-tracked data to facilitate population-level understanding of conditions [3,23,151].…”
Section: Privacy and Ethical Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%