2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design optimization of hybrid steel/timber structures for minimal environmental impact and financial cost: A case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Improvements in structural properties are made to adapt to functional requirements Lagaros (2014), , Yang et al (2010) and Systems (2005) Environmental impact minimization Optimization of structure to minimize its impact on the environment, including emissions of gases, structure in water and material impact on aquatic species Lagaros (2018), Lim and Park (2009), de Medeiros and Kripka (2014) and Van Cauteren et al (2022) Multi-objective Process of multiple objectives from all those mentioned above Al-Saadi et al (2021), Marler and Arora (2004), Zavala et al (2014a) and Quaglia et al (2014) Table 1.…”
Section: Structural Performance Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements in structural properties are made to adapt to functional requirements Lagaros (2014), , Yang et al (2010) and Systems (2005) Environmental impact minimization Optimization of structure to minimize its impact on the environment, including emissions of gases, structure in water and material impact on aquatic species Lagaros (2018), Lim and Park (2009), de Medeiros and Kripka (2014) and Van Cauteren et al (2022) Multi-objective Process of multiple objectives from all those mentioned above Al-Saadi et al (2021), Marler and Arora (2004), Zavala et al (2014a) and Quaglia et al (2014) Table 1.…”
Section: Structural Performance Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…proach and without evaluating possible trade-offs among life cycle stages: eco-efficient material choices [23][24][25]; design optimization to reduce environmental and economic impacts [26,27]; circular economy in the construction sector [28,29], or design for deconstruction/disassembly [29][30][31]; design for flexibility and adaptability [29,30]; reuse of structural elements [32][33][34], particularly of steel [35][36][37] and timber [38,39] structures; RC aggregate recycling [40]; advantages and drawbacks of prefabrication [41,42], etc. In the following, an overview of the main design choices and strategies available to enhance the sustainability of buildings from the early stages of design is presented, possible trade-offs and drawbacks are evaluated, and the possibility to combine more than one strategy to achieve the new LCT-based design objectives is addressed.…”
Section: Lct Approach For the Design Of Building Retrofit Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new European framework Level (s) for sustainable buildings [22] allows for the inclusion of sustainability objectives from an early stage of the design (level 1), but, similarly to green building rating systems, it is quite a rigid framework, which does not allow one to consider specific needs of stakeholders or regions (for example, the same indicators potentially apply to areas prone to earthquakes, flood, or drought, thus overlooking the possible impact variations from one region to another). Many other studies focus just on one of these design objectives, without adopting a comprehensive approach and without evaluating possible trade-offs among life cycle stages: eco-efficient material choices [23][24][25]; design optimization to reduce environmental and economic impacts [26,27]; circular economy in the construction sector [28,29], or design for deconstruction/disassembly [29][30][31]; design for flexibility and adaptability [29,30]; reuse of structural elements [32][33][34], particularly of steel [35][36][37] and timber [38,39] structures; RC aggregate recycling [40]; advantages and drawbacks of prefabrication [41,42], etc.…”
Section: Lct Approach For the Design Of Building Retrofit Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation