Design Science in Practice: Designing an Electricity Demand Response System

Bodenbenner, Philipp; Feuerriegel, Stefan; Neumann, Dirk

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38827-9_20

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The developed artifact (framework) is tested regarding validity, utility, and reliability [21]. The development of the artifact itself is based on the six steps of Peffers et al [41] and integrates different sources for design, development, testing, evaluation, and iterations, as shown in other DSR studies [3,8]. We describe the problem definition and objectives first, followed by the design and development process, as suggested by Gregor and Hevner [18].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Blockchain Technology for Emergency Response

Siemon¹,

Rueckel²,

Krumay

2020

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As unforeseen situations, emergencies threaten the environment, property, and people's lives. Large emergencies are characterized by the demand for coordination of a variety of actors, such as civil defense or disaster relief. Communication and information exchange are crucial for coordination. Therefore, a solid, stable communication infrastructure is among the crucial factors for emergency response. New technologies that seem to ensure trustworthy communication must be evaluated constantly. Blockchain technology is widely applied in a broad variety of contexts and is commonly known for its decentralized and distributed governance. This is the motivation for the design and evaluation of a framework for the adoption of blockchain technology in the case of emergency response following a design science approach. Evaluation of the artifact using a specific evaluation framework clearly indicates the suitability of the case for application of blockchain technology.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Blockchain Technology for Emergency Response

Siemon¹,

Rueckel²,

Krumay

2020

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Positive experiences related to Design Evaluation " … design science research with its iterative solving process allowed us to adjust and refine the focus of our research in an unconventional manner" [2], (p. 304). "We noticed the value of real-world simulations for evaluating design artifacts" [2], (p. 304). Table 6.…”

Section: The Design Cyclementioning

confidence: 98%

“…Action Experience Grounding "Reflecting on our experience in designing the Demand Response system, we appreciate design science research as it assisted us in the search process to discover an effective solution to our problem" [2], (p. 304). …”

Section: Table 7 Positive Experiences Related To Design As a Search mentioning

confidence: 99%

Empirical Grounding of Design Science Research Methodology

Cronholm

Göbel

2015

New Horizons in Design Science: Broadening the Research Agenda

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The purpose of this paper is to empirically ground design science research methodology (DSR). We claim that popular DSR methodologies lack solid empirical grounding since they are based on reconstructions of studies conducted for other purposes. Thus, we have systematically collected methodology users' empirical experiences and reflections from DSR projects. The overall findings show that the experiences are mainly positive. However, there are negative experiences such as the guidelines' granularity, lack of rigorousness concerning evaluation of new knowledge, and support for collaboration.

show abstract