2019
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201812109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing a rigorous microscopy experiment: Validating methods and avoiding bias

Abstract: Jost and Waters review best practices for validation of quantitative microscopy methods and strategies to avoid unconscious bias in imaging experiments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(173 reference statements)
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not have a good explanation for this, but it is worth noting that while formal training in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular and cellular biology is mandatory in most undergraduate and graduate biomedical programs, microscopy and imaging are rarely part of the curriculum. Our suspicion is that authors are not quite sure as to what really matters in an imaging experiment ( Jost and Waters, 2019 ; North, 2006 ). It is interesting to note that the Nature Research Life Sciences Reporting Summary includes specific and detailed questionnaires for antibodies, cell lines, statistical analysis, ChIP-Seq, flow cytometry, and MRI, but not for optical imaging ( https://www.nature.com/documents/nr-reporting-summary-flat.pdf ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not have a good explanation for this, but it is worth noting that while formal training in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular and cellular biology is mandatory in most undergraduate and graduate biomedical programs, microscopy and imaging are rarely part of the curriculum. Our suspicion is that authors are not quite sure as to what really matters in an imaging experiment ( Jost and Waters, 2019 ; North, 2006 ). It is interesting to note that the Nature Research Life Sciences Reporting Summary includes specific and detailed questionnaires for antibodies, cell lines, statistical analysis, ChIP-Seq, flow cytometry, and MRI, but not for optical imaging ( https://www.nature.com/documents/nr-reporting-summary-flat.pdf ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using a microscopy image, it is important to remember that we are looking at an image and not the biological specimen. Further we must consider sources of errors in the process and if the image truly represents the biology of the specimen (159). For a long time, one of the major limitations of microscopy has been the diffraction limit.…”
Section: Fluorescence Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equally important is to choose the correct approach and technique for the question in mind. It is important to use known samples and control experiments to validate methods and identify errors, and test approaches for error correction (159). In this thesis we have used wide variety of microscopy methods (Figure 16), each of these methods has their advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Fluorescence Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the greatest barriers to rigorous and reproducible confocal microscope experiments is encountered before an image is even taken: how do you select the field of view in an unbiased way ? Unlike other disciplines where blinded experiments are routine, confocal microscopy is often performed by the same person who prepares the specimens.…”
Section: Selection Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%