“…Lithium (Li) metal with a high theoretical capacity (3860 mAh g –1 ) and the lowest redox potential (−3.04 V vs the standard hydrogen electrode) is one of the most promising anode alternatives for next-generation rechargeable batteries with high energy density. , However, the industrialized carbonate-based liquid electrolytes are incompatible with the Li anode, thus resulting in an unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), , limited cycle life, , and severe safety risks of electrolyte leakage and fires. , To tackle these dilemmas, replacing the flammable organic solvent with an all-solid-state electrolyte is a feasible way. , Great research efforts have been devoted to exploring solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) due to their low density, excellent flexibility, and good processing compatibility with the current roll-to-roll technique for all-solid-state lithium metal batteries. , Up to now, the most widely studied and employed SPE is still the composite of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide (LiTFSI), whose ion transport behavior was found more than 40 years ago though the ionic conductivity was relatively low (∼10 –6 S cm –1 ). , During the following decades, efforts have been devoted to solve the problem of sluggish Li ion transport in the SPE, and a moderate ionic conductivity (∼10 –4 S cm –1 ) has already been achieved at room temperature by modifying polymer molecules, − optimizing electrolyte physical structures, − introducing organic plasticizers or inorganic fillers, etc. − However, the long-term cycling stability of all-solid-state lithium batteries with the LiTFSI-PEO SPE is still affected by the poor SPE/Li anode interface compatibility . This is mainly attributed to the low lithium ion transference number ( t + < 0.2) and weak film-forming ability on a Li metal anode of the LiTFSI salt. , It is well-known that LiTFSI exhibits high charge delocalization and ionic conductivity in SPEs .…”