2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9804-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility: An Integrative Framework Grounded in Theory and Practice

Abstract: This article introduces an integrative framework of corporate social responsibility (CSR) design and implementation. A review of CSR literature-in particular with regard to design and implementation models-provides the background to develop a multiple case study. The resulting integrative framework, based on this multiple case study and Lewin's change model, highlights four stages that span nine steps of the CSR design and implementation process.Finally, the study identifies critical success factors for the CS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
199
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 415 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
5
199
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the perception of consumers regarding the CSR activities carried out by enterprises, will be essential to achieve a better brand image of products or services (den Hond & de Bakker, 2007). That is why CSR actions and activities have a positive, significant relation with brand image (Smith, 2003;Maignan et al, 2005;Porter & Kramer, 2006;Ellen et al, 2006;Maon et al, 2009). Therefore, considering the information presented above, at this point it is possible to establish the following hypothesis:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Consequently, the perception of consumers regarding the CSR activities carried out by enterprises, will be essential to achieve a better brand image of products or services (den Hond & de Bakker, 2007). That is why CSR actions and activities have a positive, significant relation with brand image (Smith, 2003;Maignan et al, 2005;Porter & Kramer, 2006;Ellen et al, 2006;Maon et al, 2009). Therefore, considering the information presented above, at this point it is possible to establish the following hypothesis:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this perspective, among the others, customers and human resources emerge as relevant stakeholders for any socially responsible company. In fact, even though external and internal respectively to organizational boundaries (Sirgy, 2002), customers and HR are both generally considered in literature as primary stakeholders (Carroll, 1993;Clarkson, 1995;Maon et al, 2009;Park & Ghauri, 2014), given a significant impact on the achievement of core mission of the business. In fact, without their cooperation and support, it is acknowledged that the company may not survive (regarding the distinction between the different stakeholder groups, the challenge for the company's management is to ensure that the primary stakeholders achieve their objectives while the other stakeholders are also satisfied.…”
Section: Stakeholder Management and Csr Governance Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Maon, Lindgreen, andSwaen (2009), Lewin's (1951) change theory is the most popular because it revolves around the concept of doing away with previous processes to allow new processes to become the norm. As business processes and practices become outdated and are no longer suitable for the competitive situations, organizations move toward changes (Hanafizadeh & Osouli, 2011).…”
Section: International Journal Of Human Resource Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%