Designing centralised and distributed system integrity protection schemes for enhanced electric grid resiliency

Ravikumar, Krishnanjan Gubba; Srivastava, Anurag K.

doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5381

Cited by 11 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The dynamic model parameters of the system that is, inertia constant H, internal voltage E q and transient impedance x 0 d needs to be computed to apply EEAC. These parameters can be computed by using the Equations (28) and (29).…”

Section: Fmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Recent trends in integrity protection of power system: A literature review

Rajalwal

Ghosh

2020

Int Trans Electr Energ Syst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: An increase in the load demand has been forcing the electrical components to work near their allowable limits. The transformation of the power system in terms of technology and geographical stretch has imposed the necessity of employing advanced protection schemes in the system. The system integrity protection scheme (SIPS) has evolved as an effective measure with the gradual sprawl of the conventional grid with local measurements to a smart grid with wide-area measurement system. Aims: SIPS is a rapidly growing field in the power system and thus the study of its performance analysis, implementation methods, and applications is necessary. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of SIPS technology. Materials & Methods: In this paper, SIPS definition and classification are briefly discussed. SIPS normalization schemes that include load shedding, controlled islanding, generation rejection, ou-of-step prediction, relay settings are elaborated. To implement these normalization schemes, various methods such as index-based, optimization-based, WAMS based, EAC based, and ML-based are discussed and compared. Finally, a comparative assessment is framed based on SIPS applied for different power system issues such as transient instability, voltage instability, overloading, line contingency, protection security, etc. Results: It is observed that most of the proposed SIPS are implemented for improving transient stability. The preferred solution for implementing the SIPS by the researchers is load shedding. It is also observed that there is a lack of implementation of SIPS with renewable energy systems.

show abstract

Section: Fmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A typical SIPS architecture may have a set of components that is, intelligent electronic devices, input/output modules, front‐end processors, SIPS controllers, SIPS workstation, operating console, and GPS. The detailed working of each component is discussed in Reference 28. The primary data sources for SIPS are PMUs.…”

Section: Overview Of Sips Technologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Recent trends in integrity protection of power system: A literature review

Rajalwal

Ghosh

2020

Int Trans Electr Energ Syst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A study carried out at 35 kV using the IEC61850 Goose wide area protection scheme, which is proposed DFIG‐based microgrid [11]. System integrity protection scheme (SIPS), which uses the communication channel, is implemented for the distribution system in [12]. Based on the changes in the I d and I q components of fault current on the stator and rotor sides, the differential protection scheme is proposed only for the protection of type III DFIG [13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identification and nature detection of series and shunt faults in types I, III and IV wind turbines and PV integrated hybrid microgrid with a fuzzy logic‐based adaptive protection scheme

Singh

Basak

2020

IET gener. transm. distrib.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A comprehensive RAS system consists of many individual control features, such as generation rejection, load rejection, under‐frequency load shedding (UFLS) [2], under‐voltage load shedding [3], adaptive load shedding schemes [4, 5], out‐of‐step tripping, Volt‐Var reactive power control programs that involving load‐tap‐changers [6], shunt capacitors, SVC/STATCOM and FACTS devices etc. More response‐based RAS applications driven by synchrophasor measurements have also been proposed and implemented on power systems for complex RAS [7–9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To address the reliability of deployed RAS applications, periodic functional evaluation tests on RAS controllers is an essential task to verify the correctness of the automated operations [10] typically every 5–6 years. For more complex RAS with decentralised and centralised optimisation, testing will be required more often [7]. For example, Southern California Edison and Salt River Project do periodic tests on its RAS systems by scheduling maintenance and outages [11, 12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%