Designing China’s national carbon emissions trading system in a transitional period

Duan, Maosheng; Qi, Shaozhou; Wu, Libo

doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1477288

Cited by 14 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…in clean energy between 2015 and 2016 (BNEF, 2017), and with planned investments of approximately $360 billion up to 2020 (Griffiths, 2017). Furthermore, the government announced the development of a National Carbon Emissions Trading System in 2017, which is currently being developed (Duan, Qi, & Wu, 2018). Third, in addition to these external influences, domestic pressures have significantly increased in the past decade in China (Faria & Andersen, 2017; Lin, 2010; Yin & Zhang, 2012).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supply chain collaboration and eco‐innovations: An institutional perspective from China

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study explores the impact of supply chain collaboration on eco‐innovations in the context of 220 Chinese manufacturing supplier firms involved in global supply chain networks. It investigates how supplier and customer collaborations help firms to enhance product eco‐innovations, and/or process eco‐innovations, and how the institutional context (i.e., regulatory, market, and community pressures) influences these relationships. The structural equation modeling approach is used to analyze the data captured from medium and large manufacturing enterprises in three major sectors: automotive, electronics, and textiles. The results show that community pressure has a positive effect on supplier collaboration, which further leads to enhanced process eco‐innovation. On the other hand, the findings indicate that while market pressure enhances customer collaboration, this does not reinforce product eco‐innovation. Contrary to our expectation, regulatory pressures do not impact supplier or customer collaboration for innovation. Overall, different institutional factors indicate divergent effects on supply chain collaboration and product/process eco‐innovation. The importance of normative pressures, such as those applied through the local community and interest groups, for eco‐innovations in production processes is further discussed as a typical feature of the institutional environment of Chinese supplier firms.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supply chain collaboration and eco‐innovations: An institutional perspective from China

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Economic development is another important factor of sett the total amount of carbon emissions [7] , for example, China 's commitment to reach the carbon peak in 2023 ; carbon emission intensity decreased by about 65 % compared with 2005. Based on this goal, the study found that carbon emissions are affected by China 's economy [8]. At present, China 's total carbon emissions are not clear, so the economy will become one of the important factors affecting China 's total carbon emissions.…”

Section: 1setting Of the Total Amount Of Carbon Emission Rightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on the Theory and Development of Carbon Emissions Trading Market under the Background of ‘Double Carbon’

Shen¹,

Wang²,

Liu³

et al. 2023

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, China’s carbon trading market has achieved good emission reduction results but it is not yet perfect. Carbon trading mechanisms are facing huge challenges. Through the analysis of the current industry carbon trading market, the problems existing affecting the process of the carbon emission trading market are deeply discussed, providing a methodology for the regional carbon trading mechanism and the implementation of the national macro carbon emission reduction targets. It puts forward three challenges to carbon trading market cognition, carbon trading subject and carbon emission reduction technology, to contribute to achieving carbon peak, carbon neutralization.

show abstract

“…In 2015, the Chinese government announced that it will develop a national‐level carbon market. Starting from the power sector, it will develop the national market focusing on eight energy‐intensive sectors (Duan et al ., 2018). What was the impact of the seven pilot schemes in China?…”

Section: Market Policy Instrumentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Energy‐Related Environmental Policy and Its Impacts on Energy Use in Asia

Arimura

Sugino

2020

Asian Economic Policy Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Economic growth in Asia has increased in the past three decades and has heightened energy demand, resulting in rising greenhouse gas emissions and severe air pollution. To tackle these issues, fuel switching and the deployment of renewables are essential. In the present paper, we discuss the environmental regulations, mainly carbon pricing, implemented in Asia and discuss their achievements. Empirical studies using microdata have shown that carbon pricing in Asia can reduce carbon emissions by promoting energy efficiency. At the macro level, we observe some evidence of fuel switching from coal to natural gas among major emitters. However, more carbon pricing is necessary in Asia if we aim for the decarbonization of the economy.

show abstract

Designing China’s national carbon emissions trading system in a transitional period

Cited by 14 publications

References 15 publications

Supply chain collaboration and eco‐innovations: An institutional perspective from China

Supply chain collaboration and eco‐innovations: An institutional perspective from China

Research on the Theory and Development of Carbon Emissions Trading Market under the Background of ‘Double Carbon’

Energy‐Related Environmental Policy and Its Impacts on Energy Use in Asia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About