2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.disc.2020.112159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing DNA codes from reversible self-dual codes over GF(4)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A DNA code can be identified with a code over F 4 = {0, 1, ω, ω 2 } by employing the standard bijective correspondence between F 4 and the DNA alphabet S D 4 = {A, T, C, G} given by η : F 4 → S D 4 , with η(0) = A, η(1) = T, η(ω) = C and η(ω 2 ) = G. The same correspondence has already been used in the literature, for example, please see [14]. We extend the bijection η so that η(C) is regarded as a DNA code for some code C over F 4 .…”
Section: Linear Codes and Dna Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A DNA code can be identified with a code over F 4 = {0, 1, ω, ω 2 } by employing the standard bijective correspondence between F 4 and the DNA alphabet S D 4 = {A, T, C, G} given by η : F 4 → S D 4 , with η(0) = A, η(1) = T, η(ω) = C and η(ω 2 ) = G. The same correspondence has already been used in the literature, for example, please see [14]. We extend the bijection η so that η(C) is regarded as a DNA code for some code C over F 4 .…”
Section: Linear Codes and Dna Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some known methods for designing DNA codes that satisfy certain conditions include the study of reversible self-dual codes over GF (4) [14], the study of cyclic and extended cyclic constructions [1] or the study of linear constructions [12]. Recently in [8], linear codes derived from group ring elements are considered to construct reversible DNA codes that satisfy the Hamming distance, reverse, reverse-complement and the fixed GC-content constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Siap et al [22] identified the four symbols A, C, G, T with the elements in R, and constructed cyclic DNA codes considering the GC-content(GC-weight) constraint over R and used the deletion distance. Our previous papers [5], [15] also introduced efficient and feasible algorithms for designing DNA codes from reversible self-dual codes over the finite field GF (4). We could point out that our algorithms take advantage of the reversibility and selfduality of reversible self-dual codes over GF (4) in [5], [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous papers [5], [15] also introduced efficient and feasible algorithms for designing DNA codes from reversible self-dual codes over the finite field GF (4). We could point out that our algorithms take advantage of the reversibility and selfduality of reversible self-dual codes over GF (4) in [5], [15]. We expect similar algorithms for designing DNA codes to apply to reversible self-dual codes over the ring F 2 + uF 2 as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…⟨0, 3, 4, 7, 10, 11, 14⟩, 1,4 = ⟨1, 2, 6, 7, 10, 12, 14⟩, 2,2 = ⟨0, 1⟩, 2,3 = ⟨1, 4, 5, 9, 10, 15⟩, 2,4 = ⟨0, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 12, 14⟩, 3,3 = 3,4 = ⟨0, 1, 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15, 16⟩, ⟨0⟨0, 1⟩, 1,4 = 2,5 = ⟨1, 4⟩, 1,5 = 2,4 = ⟨1, 2, 3, 4⟩, ⟨0⟨2, 4⟩, 1,5 = 4,4 = 4,6 = ⟨0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5⟩, 1,6 = ⟨0, 1, 3, 5⟩, 2,4 = ⟨3⟩, 2,6 = ⟨0, 1, 2, 4, 5⟩, 3,3 = ⟨0, 1⟩, 3,4 = ⟨0, 3, 4⟩, 3,5 = ⟨3, 4⟩, 3,6 = ⟨0, 2, 5⟩, ⟨0⟨1, 4⟩, 2,5 = ⟨0, 1, 4, 5⟩, 2,6 = 3,6 = 4,4 = 4,6 = ⟨0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5⟩, 2,7 = ⟨1⟩, 3,3 = ⟨0, 2, 4⟩, 3,7 = ⟨1, 3, 5⟩, ⟨0⟨0, 2, 4⟩, 1,6 = 2,5 = 3,8 = 4,7 = ⟨0, 1, 4⟩, 1,7 = 2,8 = ⟨0, 2⟩, 1,8 = ⟨1, 2, 4⟩, 2,6 = 3,7 = ⟨3⟩, 2,7 = ⟨2⟩, 3,5 = 4,6 = ⟨1⟩, 3,6 = ⟨1, 4⟩, 4,5 = ⟨1, 2, 3, 4⟩, 5,5 = 6,6 = 7,7 = 8,8 = ⟨0, 5⟩954 24 121,1 = 1,2 = 3,3 = 3,4 = ⟨0⟩, 1,6 = ⟨1⟩, 1,7 = ⟨1, 3, 5⟩, 1,8 = ⟨0, 2⟩, 1,9 = 2,5 = 3,5 = 4,5 = ⟨1, 2,4, 5⟩, 2,2 = 4,4 = ⟨0, 1⟩, 2,6 = 4,8 = ⟨0, 1, 4⟩, 2,7 = ⟨0, 1, 2, 3, 4⟩, 2,8 = ⟨1, 4⟩, 2,9 = ⟨0, 2, 3, 4⟩, 3,6 = ⟨3, 4⟩, 3,7 = ⟨0, 1, 3, 5⟩, 3,8 = ⟨2⟩, 3,9 = ⟨2, 3, 5⟩, 4,6 = ⟨0, 1, 2, 3⟩, 4,7 = ⟨0, 1, 2, 5⟩, 4,9 = ⟨0, 2, 4⟩, 5,5 = 7,7 = 9,9 = ⟨0, 6⟩, 6,6 = 6,7 = 8,8 = 8,9 = ⟨0, 1, 2, 3,…”
unclassified