Designing enhanced labeling information to increase consumer willingness to pay for genetically modified foods

Abstract

PurposeThe regulations for qualitative genetically modified (GM) food labeling do not effectively eliminate the information asymmetries pertaining to the consumption of GM products. China's GM food labeling law requires the presentation of certain categories of GM products on GMO labels on packages. Such information is invaluable for understanding whether the disclosure of more information on GM foods can help alleviate information asymmetry while reducing consumer fear and risk perceptions of GM foods, and thus cause changes in their behaviors. The purpose of this paper is to explore the heterogeneity of consumer preferences for enhanced GM food labeling, how consumer preferences are influenced by labeling information, and how these preferences vary in different consumers.Design/methodology/approachBoth descriptive statistics and econometric techniques, including the multivariate ordered Probit model, were applied to a sample of 566 urban consumers in the Yangtze River Delta region of China. All respondents were divided into two groups: people who would definitely not buy GM foods before selecting enhanced labeling information (“consumer group 1”, sample size 282) and people who would definitely not object to buying GM foods before selecting enhanced labeling information (“consumer group 2”, sample size 274).FindingsThe findings suggest that urban consumers have a preference for different types of enhanced labeling information about GM foods, that such a preference significantly influences their willingness to pay for GM foods, that there exists a large difference in the preferences of different consumer groups, and that enhanced GM food labeling information has a greater impact on those consumers who would not accept GM foods.Originality/valueThis research identifies the GM information disclosures that most affect consumer preferences and how these preferences vary across different segments of consumers, which is a current gap in the literature. The study has demonstrated that enhanced labels of GM foods with diverse information would not alter a consumer's WTP for GM foods who does not perceive the value of information from the enhanced labels, but change positively consumers with uncertainty willingness to pay before disclosure.

Attitude and labelling preferences towards gene-edited food: a consumer study amongst millennials and Generation Z

“…Results suggest that these breeding techniques are not seen to be the same in consumer eyes, potentially lending support to a review of the current EU GM labelling approach, perhaps in a direction similar to the revised policies taking shape in the USA, Argentina, Australia and Japan. These align with previous research studies demonstrating different preferences for different types of GM food labels (Zhan et al , 2020). In view of the current debate surrounding the EU policy on GE food, this study also provides insights on consumer attitudes towards GE labelling as such by assessing the preference for similar or different labelling policies to be used for GE and GM food.…”

Corporate social responsibility and biotechnological foods: an experimental study on consumer’s behaviour

“…However, great care is needed so that GFs do not become just a marketing tool for companies to sponsor products of uncertain value (Rabbanee et al , 2021; Hakim et al , 2020; Sarnacchiaro and Boccia, 2018). This is why it is essential that public health authorities demonstrate clearly enough that their key interest is in public well-being, paying consideration to the logic of big profits from food, chemical and pharmaceutical companies (Zhan et al , 2021; Nam et al , 2020). Considering this scenario, it is possible to say that the case in the present study is the only one that considers a food product improved with beneficial medical substances (Waterfield et al , 2020; Xu et al , 2020).…”

The moderating effect of information channel on the relationship between type of information search and knowledge of genetically modified organisms

“…In a study by, 13 GMO labeling was found to negatively influence consumers’ opinions and behavioral intentions if consumers did not have sufficient knowledge about the usefulness of GM foods. Nevertheless, 14 found that consumers had a preference of enhanced labeling information related to GM foods and that such a preference significantly influenced their willingness to pay for GM foods. Moreover, a study by, 15 found that consumers who were uncertain about the safety of GM foods tended to be more in favor of regulation.…”