2017
DOI: 10.1115/1.4037304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing for Additive Manufacturing: Lightweighting Through Topology Optimization Enables Lunar Spacecraft

Abstract: An end-to-end development approach for space flight qualified additive manufacturing (AM) components is presented and demonstrated with a case study consisting of a system of five large, light-weight, topologically optimized components that serve as an engine mount in SpaceIL's GLPX lunar landing craft that will participate in the Google Lunar XPrize challenge. The development approach includes a preliminary design exploration intended to save numerical effort in order to allow efficient adoption of topology o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the general lack of understanding of AM processes and lack of standards, the approach to qualification of AM parts has so far been on a part-by-part and process basis, relying on both destructive and non-destructive testing (NDT) [21]. Examples of this approach for space applications can be found in literature, for example, References [11,12]. Hence, in order to establish a qualification approach (and AM requirements frameworks), organizations need to build AM understanding concurrently with the development of AM products, based on testing and inspection.…”
Section: Challenges With Qualification Of Additive Manufacturing Partsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the general lack of understanding of AM processes and lack of standards, the approach to qualification of AM parts has so far been on a part-by-part and process basis, relying on both destructive and non-destructive testing (NDT) [21]. Examples of this approach for space applications can be found in literature, for example, References [11,12]. Hence, in order to establish a qualification approach (and AM requirements frameworks), organizations need to build AM understanding concurrently with the development of AM products, based on testing and inspection.…”
Section: Challenges With Qualification Of Additive Manufacturing Partsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to achieve such drastic cost reductions for space applications, new industrial system set-ups are needed, combined with extreme design-to-cost, efficient product development and the use of AM [8,9]. Examples of AM space components that have been used in service are brackets for satellite antennas [10], brackets for spacecraft waveguides [11] and lunar lander engine mounts [12,13]. In general, however, information about the criticality level of AM parts that have been used in service is limited [3] and well-described examples of AM used for critical parts are lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current design for manufacturing techniques have been developed largely for conventional manufacturing processes [1]. Therefore, to take advantage of the design freedom enabled by AM processes, design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) methods need to be developed [1,2]. Representative DfAM methodologies include cellular structure design, topology optimization (TO), manufacturability analysis for AM, and other design approaches that can make use of the AM-enabled features [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, TO provides to the designer a great freedom, allowing complex structures, not immediately imaginable with traditional design methodologies [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AM offers also significant advantages due to its short lead times and great geometrical freedom. This advantage makes AM the natural prosecution of TO processes [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%