Designing for the 21st Century

Inns, Tom

doi:10.4324/9781315264677

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Co-design (UOD Veryzer et al, 2005) Users participating in innovation (Akrich, 2006) Design probes (Mattelmaki, 2006) Design methods (Bruce, 1998;Laurel, 2003) Design principles (Lidwell, 2003) Prospective skill (Inns, 2007) Virtual reality (Richir)…”

Section: Design Methods and Skillsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Forty Years of Research in Design Management: A Review of Literature and Directions for the Future

Mozota

Wolff

2019

Strategic Design Research Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Defining the research in Design Management (DM) involves the intersection of two disciplines: management sciences and design sciences. We focus on design management research and summarize the diversity of the relationship between these two interdisciplinary fields through a study of the international literature published between 1977 and 2017 on the subject. Firstly, the hybrid territory of design management is defined through its keywords and their evolution; using various definitions of design management, a representation of the place of design within organizations then starts to emerge. Secondly, the analysis focuses on the five key themes of design management developed in the literature-the value of design, the methods and skills of design, the tools of design, its integration in other functions, and the theme of "better manager by design"-as well as the resulting models. Finally, this review of the literature highlights the emergence in the discourse of two complementary forces: design management and design leadership.

show abstract

Section: Design Methods and Skillsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Forty Years of Research in Design Management: A Review of Literature and Directions for the Future

Mozota

Wolff

2019

Strategic Design Research Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…He started from the premise, shared by other authors, that "…competence is a…complex ability…that… (is) closely related to performance in real-life situations" [11]. When the gloves are off [1], it is simply that which enables the learner to interrogate and synergize [12] disparate knowledge systems we never fully understand and control but on whose success we depend [13,14,15]. Whereas benchmarking of specialist skills has been much studied, even the concept of competence -and particularly the methodology capable of gradually integrating it with and bringing about the relevant changes in the existing educational structures -presents a "methodological challenge" in what is a "widely neglected research field" [16].…”

Section: Developing Competence: What Is Being Done?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Leadership and Competence Development in Higher Education: Reconstituting the Human – Machine Interfaces in the Space of Digital Systems

Jaroš

2014

EDUCATION

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is an outstanding intellectual and leadership challenge in higher education to develop effective "competence" delivery and evaluation practices complementary to and building upon the traditional programs. The key obstacle is the growing generic gap between systems of thought and organization governing the established curriculum and those required for decision making conditioned by the radical changes in the divisions of labor. It is argued that this decision making takes place in an open problem space in which success depends on being able to recognize and make use of the pathways imposed upon us by digitalization of knowledge systems and work practices. These are the highways along which the current thoughts and material exchanges travel and collide, and which condition the much needed synergy of inputs spanning disparate knowledge and power systems. Two aspects of this structural problem are of particular interest here. Firstly, the boundary separating human and machinic contributions have become blurred beyond repair. Secondly, the failure to recognise fully the impact of new work practices amounts to de facto abdication by humans from taming runaway complexification. This rapidly reduces the space in which to make efforts required to ensure that the human condition-and the standing of higher education as a guardian of the consititutive role of human-human engagenment in particular-remain open for debate and perpetual re-positioning in rapidly changing circumstances. The aim here is to establish pedagogy for a fresh reappraisal of this constitutive process in the liminal space of human and machinic contributions, and one capable of engendering the human-centered character of University without depriving staff and students of benefits brought by the maturing post-mechanical culture.

show abstract

The View of the Child: Releasing “visual voices” in the design of learning environments

Burke

2007

Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Designing for the 21st Century

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Forty Years of Research in Design Management: A Review of Literature and Directions for the Future

Forty Years of Research in Design Management: A Review of Literature and Directions for the Future

Leadership and Competence Development in Higher Education: Reconstituting the Human – Machine Interfaces in the Space of Digital Systems

The View of the Child: Releasing “visual voices” in the design of learning environments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About