Proceedings of the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work - GROUP '05 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1099203.1099254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing for transformations in collaboration

Abstract: Transformations in collaborative work due to the introduction of new technology are inevitable, but are often difficult to study. In this paper, we consider the patterns of transformation that are seen in a patient-physician relationship based on the introduction of homecare monitoring equipment. We report findings from interviews and fieldwork with patients and physicians participating in a clinical experiment of homecare monitoring. By studying both the group of patients who receive homecare-based treatment … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing interactive technologies for asynchronous and synchronous communications focus on enabling the exchange of mostly quantitative data. For example, the tools that allow patients to track and monitor health indicators such as blood sugar levels and blood pressure could also be used to share narrative data with providers [7,23]. The focus on exchanging quantitative data leaves out the richness of patients' experiences that we heard in interviews.…”
Section: Limitations Of Existing Communication Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing interactive technologies for asynchronous and synchronous communications focus on enabling the exchange of mostly quantitative data. For example, the tools that allow patients to track and monitor health indicators such as blood sugar levels and blood pressure could also be used to share narrative data with providers [7,23]. The focus on exchanging quantitative data leaves out the richness of patients' experiences that we heard in interviews.…”
Section: Limitations Of Existing Communication Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…quality of face-to-face interactions [15,16]. The adoption of new communication systems can affect transformations in patient-provider communication and displace rich in-person interactions [7]. Important questions remain about how best to design these tools, given the changes they introduce to the work of patients, caregivers, and providers across clinical and nonclinical settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since privacy is an oft-cited barrier to technology adoption, this framework should assist future researchers to focus on the privacy concerns that truly matter to older adults. Bardram et al [18] explored the nature of work transfer from physician to patient when homecare technology is used, and presented design implications for how to support such ‘collaborative' care where the patient takes on more responsibility. As more healthcare is offloaded to older adults and their informal caregivers, understanding how to design technologies to support this shared work is of importance to ICT design.…”
Section: Qualitative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Telemedicine includes a wide array of applications, ranging from transmission systems for sharing medical data such as x‐ray pictures to remote health‐monitoring systems for elderly and chronically ill individuals, and from videoconferencing systems for counseling or consultation between patients and physicians or other medical specialists to video and haptic systems to support remote surgery. The majority of previous research on video and visual technologies in telemedicine has focused on consultation among a patient, a physician, and/or other health care personnel, or between physicians at distributed locations in nonemergency situations (e.g., Alem, Hansen, & Li, 2006; Bardram, Bossen, & Thomsen, 2005; Li, Wilson, Stapleton, & Cregan, 2006; Mbarika, 2004).…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%