Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces 2011
DOI: 10.1145/1943403.1943479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing socially acceptable multimodal interaction in cooking assistants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An automated cabinet system assists the user in retrieving or storing items in the kitchen according to the recipe selected (Ficocelli & Nejat, 2012). Another study evaluates the acceptance of different multimodal features of a cooking assistant depending on the context of use (Vildjiounaite et al, 2011). Studies at University of York (UK) investigated different options of electronic recipe presentations to understand cooks' preferences (Buykx & Petrie, 2011).…”
Section: Cooking Assistantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An automated cabinet system assists the user in retrieving or storing items in the kitchen according to the recipe selected (Ficocelli & Nejat, 2012). Another study evaluates the acceptance of different multimodal features of a cooking assistant depending on the context of use (Vildjiounaite et al, 2011). Studies at University of York (UK) investigated different options of electronic recipe presentations to understand cooks' preferences (Buykx & Petrie, 2011).…”
Section: Cooking Assistantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, this scenario requires cooperation between a number of smart products, specifically: Cooking Assistant, Smart Fridge, Smart Cupboards, Shopping Assistant, and Supermarket Agents, with the interactions between these smart products occurring around shared tasks in two different ambiances 3 , a Smart Kitchen and a Supermarket. The requirement for proactivity here means that the smart products must be able to proactively contribute to shared tasks, such as meal planning and shopping at the supermarket, both at the time when requests for information are broadcast but also, as in the example of the strawberries being removed from the fridge, when some event occurs which has implications for the tasks currently being executed.…”
Section: A Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the SmartProducts project has looked at a whole range of issues, which need to be tackled to support effective networks of context-aware and proactive smart products, including user interaction [3], access control models [4], and distributed storage [5], in this paper we focus on the core challenge posed by the project scenarios: the design and implementation of a computational infrastructure to realize networks of proactive smart products. Hence we will provide a complete overview of our approach, covering both the knowledge level and the symbol level [6] elements of our solution and in particular showing how we have integrated semantic technologies with ubiquitous computing solutions, to equip resource-constrained physical devices with the capability of representing and reasoning with knowledge structures and engaging in co-operative problem solving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus it makes sense to build group profiles also by combining individual preferences for the same context. After a preliminary user study with the cooking assistant [1] we concluded that the following combination strategies may be feasible to use:…”
Section: Strategies To Build Group Profiles From Individual Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is possible to always enable all available input functionality and to adapt only output, our first user study with the cooking assistant prototype [1] has shown that it is infeasible to assume that users would not care whether activity recognition is enabled or disabled if recognition results are not used in any way. Many test subjects said that tracking is annoying independently on how the data is used, because tracking "does not allow to feel like left alone".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%