Designing Sustainable Food Security Policies in Sub‐Saharan African Countries: How Social Dynamics Over‐Ride Utility Evaluations for Good and Bad

Abstract

Sub-Saharan African economies depend heavily on agriculture. Seed from improved varieties and other inputs are imperative to the transformation of the agricultural sector from subsistence farming to small-scale commercial agriculture and thus to increasing food security on the continent. Farmers make the decision to adopt seed from improved varieties based on a number of seed attributes. These range from tangible attributes such as input costs and yield to intangible attributes such as trust in seed from improved varieties. In the course of adoption decisions, social dynamics involving trust can over-ride objective evaluations of tangible attributes. This makes it difficult to design sustainable adoption policies in an intuitive way. For this purpose, we develop a system dynamics model and combine it with conjoint analysis. Conjoint analysis allows us to elicit smallholder farmers' choice preferences in detail and to add precision to the structure of the model. The simulation framework helps to improve our understanding concerning the dynamic implications of accumulation processes relating to trust and skill. We test this approach with empirical data for maize in Malawi. Model simulations demonstrate that effective adoption stimulation policies should focus on measures that build trust in improved maize varieties instead of increasing their potential yield even further and, in this way, contribute to food security.

Researching farmer behaviour in climate change adaptation and sustainable agriculture: Lessons learned from five case studies

“…Rational action models may be useful for simulating biophysical system outputs. However, they are not appropriate in accounting for the diverse rationalities that different types of decisionmakers employ in real life, as several studies in the social sciences have shown (Krandikar and Risbey, 2000;Jager et al, 2000;Darnhofer et al, 2010;Kaine and Cowan, 2011;Bacon et al, 2012;Kopainsky et al;Rasmussen and Reenberg, 2012;Ceddia et al, 2013;Galt, 2013). When translated into policy, such simplified models tend to result in a 'technical-fix' approach (Krandilkar and Risbey, 2000;Giddings et al 2002;Ribeiro and Shand, 2008;Galt, 2013;Home et al, 2014).…”

Drivers for the Adoption of Different Eco-Innovation Types in the Fertilizer Sector: A Review

“…Furthermore, it can provide a good information exchange, which is also an important trigger for the adoption of disruptive process innovations [67,78,83,97,99,101,102]. To push a new production technology, farmers need to have access to a market where they can buy the technology or the knowledge about this specific technology and where they can get a credit for this particular purchase.…”

Revisión de enfoques de políticas alimentarias: entre la seguridad y la soberanía alimentaria (2000-2013)

“…Con una perspectiva dinámica, Kopainsky et al 25 desarrollan un marco socio-técnico de análisis de políticas públicas, que tiene por objeto mejorar la comprensión de la transformación de la agricultura de subsistencia y evaluar las políticas de apoyo a esta transformación. Usando un modelo de simulación adoptan determinantes y procesos descritos en la literatura, confirmados por análisis empíricos; cuyos determinantes más importantes son la utilidad local de semillas, la compatibilidad con las prácticas agrícolas de subsistencia y las habilidades para el cultivo, entre otros.…”