2018
DOI: 10.7567/jjap.57.067202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designs for improving electromagnetic acoustic transducers’ excitation performance

Abstract: The main drawback of electromagnetic acoustic transducers (EMATs) is their low energy transition efficiency. For the purpose of increasing the amplitude of the received signal, a ferrite core (FC) and a bias magnet (BM) are utilized respectively to improve the EMAT's excitation performance in this paper. It indicates that the new configurations can increase the peak-to-peak amplitude of the received signal by a factor of 2.7 and 2.9, respectively. The reasons for the signal enhancement are also investigated th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of an EMAT is much lower than that of a piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer due to its complicated mechanism [24,25]. In order to obtain a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), it is usually required to optimize the transducer [26,27,28]. The magnetostriction-based EMAT has proved to be useful in measuring the magnetostriction coefficients of silicon steel strips.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of an EMAT is much lower than that of a piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer due to its complicated mechanism [24,25]. In order to obtain a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), it is usually required to optimize the transducer [26,27,28]. The magnetostriction-based EMAT has proved to be useful in measuring the magnetostriction coefficients of silicon steel strips.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low-frequency electromagnetic field is applied by exciting coil, and the yoke in this excitation structure is selected as C-type, which can generate a higher low-frequency leakage magnetic field density than the conventional U-shaped yoke. 5) The LFET coil is generally used as the signal receiving medium [6][7][8] instead of magneto sensor [9][10][11] due to the lowfrequency leakage magnetic field signal on the surface of the inspected specimen is weak. The LFET coil's voltage output amplitude is directly proportional to the change rate of the lowfrequency leakage magnetic field magnetic flux, thereby making the determination of the surface defects of the inspected material convenient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%