2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12402.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desorption from interstellar ices

Abstract: The desorption of molecular species from ice mantles back into the gas phase in molecular clouds results from a variety of very poorly understood processes. We have investigated three mechanisms: desorption resulting from H 2 formation on grains, direct cosmic ray heating and cosmic ray-induced photodesorption. Whilst qualitative differences exist between these processes (essentially deriving from the assumptions concerning the species selectivity of the desorption and the assumed threshold adsorption energies… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
164
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
164
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given the high densities involved in the hot environments modelled in this paper, and since nonthermal desorption mechanisms and their efficiencies are not determined very well experimentally (e.g. see Roberts et al 2007), adjusting the final percentage of freeze out by reducing the efficiency of the sticking to the grains (via the f r parameter) is sufficient, therefore avoiding extra free parameters. On the other hand, having Phase I as a separate step calculation allows that the initial molecular fractional abundances used in Phase II calculations are computed by a real time dependence of the chemical evolution of gas-dust interaction processes, i.e.…”
Section: Chemical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given the high densities involved in the hot environments modelled in this paper, and since nonthermal desorption mechanisms and their efficiencies are not determined very well experimentally (e.g. see Roberts et al 2007), adjusting the final percentage of freeze out by reducing the efficiency of the sticking to the grains (via the f r parameter) is sufficient, therefore avoiding extra free parameters. On the other hand, having Phase I as a separate step calculation allows that the initial molecular fractional abundances used in Phase II calculations are computed by a real time dependence of the chemical evolution of gas-dust interaction processes, i.e.…”
Section: Chemical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the velocity of the jet-induced shock, dust grains can be either partially or completely destroyed by sputtering, grain-grain collisions, and shattering (e.g., Jones et al 1994;Van Loo et al 2013). Moreover, the processing by both UV photons and cosmic rays can cause non-thermal desorption of volatile species from the icy grain mantles into the gas phase (e.g., Hartquist & Williams 1990;Roberts et al 2007). However, it is also possible that higher values of β are actually caused by the growth of icy mantles on dust grains (e.g., Schnee et al 2010a, and references therein), but this seems to contradict the chemical features discussed earlier.…”
Section: Dust Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sticking coefficient used by previous authors (i.e. Willacy & Williams 1993;Nejad & Wagenblast 1999;Roberts et al 2007;Aikawa et al 1997;Turner 1998b;Willacy & Millar 1998;Brown & Charnley 1990) for heavy species is 0.1 to 1, usually around 0.33, and that for light species is 0 to 1. We took an approximate average path with S i = 0.33 for all heavy species and 0.1 for hydrogen atoms and H 2 molecules.…”
Section: Molecule Accretion Onto Grainsmentioning
confidence: 99%