2008
DOI: 10.1108/09596110810852122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Destination marketing: competition, cooperation or coopetition?

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to understand the business relationships among the tourism industry stakeholders in conducting collaborative destination marketing activities. Design/methodology/approach -This research takes a case study approach by focusing on the investigation of the business relationships among tourism industry stakeholders in Elkhart County, Indiana. Interviews with five staff members from the Elkhart County Convention and Visitors Bureau as well as 32 tourism industry representatives… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
192
0
20

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
192
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Getting more visitors could mean increased ticket revenue to the event, which in turn would reduce the need for public subsidy and-at the same time-lead to more business at the destination for local enterprises. Such a coopetition relationship is, in fact, the most mutually advantageous to all stakeholders (Wang & Krakover, 2008). To sum up, diffuse stakeholders should not be forgotten as stakeholder influence is neither static with regards to resources nor the network position.…”
Section: Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Getting more visitors could mean increased ticket revenue to the event, which in turn would reduce the need for public subsidy and-at the same time-lead to more business at the destination for local enterprises. Such a coopetition relationship is, in fact, the most mutually advantageous to all stakeholders (Wang & Krakover, 2008). To sum up, diffuse stakeholders should not be forgotten as stakeholder influence is neither static with regards to resources nor the network position.…”
Section: Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information and knowledge are important tourism resources in the networks used by all stakeholders to collectively market their destination and at the same time compete with each other for individual benefits (Hazra et al, 2014). Such coexistence of cooperation and competition (coopetition) relationships with each other is regarded as an efficient way of achieving success for individual benefits as well as common benefits (Wang & Krakover, 2008). Centrally positioned stakeholders have direct influence on the exchange of resources in this "coopetition" relationship, whereas peripheral stakeholders tend to depend on other stakeholders to access other regions of the network (Rowley, 1997).…”
Section: Network Centralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fi rms investigated in this study engage in indirect competition against each other for the main purpose of value appropriation and utilization 32,42,43 and for the purpose of gaining market position. However, the resources and capabilities of the fi rms (vendors in the Food Court, Fujitsu Services and AWPK) are the primary determinants of their strategies and performances (see also Prahalad and Hamel, 30 Grant 57 ).…”
Section: Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 The main motive for cooperation is to adopt collective strategies for value generation. 43 Basically, fi rms cooperate for the purpose of achieving a common goal, and as a result share resources with other competing actors or acquire them in the event they are lacking. 43 Firms also cooperate for the purpose of learning or sharing organizational expertise.…”
Section: Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compete in the international market, the cooperation of all relevant stakeholders is very important (Wang, Krakover 2008). Although these stakeholders have various interests and in a particular situation can act as competitors, it is crucial for them to collaborate in order to reach new target groups, new markets and keep their customers.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%