34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 1998
DOI: 10.2514/6.1998-3482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Destructive evaluation of a xenon hollow cathode after a 28,000 hour life test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 an end of life criterion has been derived and the model has been tuned to predict a lifetime of 28,000 hours fitting the experimental evidence for this cathode.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4 an end of life criterion has been derived and the model has been tuned to predict a lifetime of 28,000 hours fitting the experimental evidence for this cathode.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computed surface coverage relative to Ba 3 WO 6 and BaWO 4 As it can be noted in the figures above the low work function compounds depletion starts at the downstream end of the cathode and then slowly moves upstream. This is due to the fact that the sputtering desorption rate is proportional to ion density and plasma voltage and that these two parameters are maximum at the downstream end of the cathode.…”
Section: 000 Hours Cathode Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, a higher operating temperature due to increased work function ac-A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t celerates the evaporation of Ba from the surface and the reaction between the impregnant and the tungsten, leading 45 to more rapid depletion of the barium supply. The formation of solid barium tungstate layers has been observed on portions of the cathode emitter surface in several long duration tests [4,5,6]. BaWO 4 is a poor electron emitter and a stable product of the reaction between the impregnant 50 and the tungsten matrix [7], so it will not act as an electron source or provide Ba or BaO to replenish the adsorbates on the tungsten surfaces in the insert.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%