2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2020.126105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desulfolutivibrio sulfoxidireducens gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a pyrite-forming enrichment culture and reclassification of Desulfovibrio sulfodismutans as Desulfolutivibrio sulfodismutans comb. nov

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genes were identified using Prodigal (Hyatt et al ., 2010) as part of the JGI genome annotation pipeline (Huntemann et al ., 2015). The complete genome of the reference strain Geovibrio thiophilus DSM 11263 T was determined at the Leibniz Institute DSMZ using a hybrid sequencing strategy involving long‐read PacBio and short‐read Illumina sequencing technologies as reported earlier (Thiel et al ., 2020). Genome sequences of strains L21‐Ace‐BES T , Seleniivibrio woodruffii DSM 24984 T and Geovibrio thiophilus DSM 11263 T are available in the NCBI GenBank database under the accession numbers ATWF00000000, SMGG00000000 and CP035108, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genes were identified using Prodigal (Hyatt et al ., 2010) as part of the JGI genome annotation pipeline (Huntemann et al ., 2015). The complete genome of the reference strain Geovibrio thiophilus DSM 11263 T was determined at the Leibniz Institute DSMZ using a hybrid sequencing strategy involving long‐read PacBio and short‐read Illumina sequencing technologies as reported earlier (Thiel et al ., 2020). Genome sequences of strains L21‐Ace‐BES T , Seleniivibrio woodruffii DSM 24984 T and Geovibrio thiophilus DSM 11263 T are available in the NCBI GenBank database under the accession numbers ATWF00000000, SMGG00000000 and CP035108, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter, Desulfocurvus ( Klouche et al, 2009 ) and Desulfobaculum ( Zhao et al, 2012 ) were added. The addition of several new genera, namely Pseudodesulfovibrio ( Cao et al, 2016 ), Halodesulfovibrio ( Shivani et al, 2017 ), “Mailhella” ( Ndongo et al, 2017 ), Desulfohalovibrio , Desulfocurvibacter ( Spring et al, 2019 ), “ Paradesulfovibrio” ( Kim et al, 2020 ), and Desulfolutivibrio ( Thiel et al, 2020 ), finally led to a major reorganization based on the genome sequence data ( Waite et al, 2020 ), resulting in Desulfovibrionaceae currently comprising nine validly published genera ( Fundidesulfovibrio, Humidesulfovibrio, Maridesulfovibrio, Megalodesulfovibrio, Nitratidesulfovibrio, Oleidesulfovibrio, Paradesulfovibrio, Paucidesulfovibrio , and Solidesulfovibrio ) and three published but not validated genera ( “Alteridesulfovibrio,” “Aminidesulfovibrio,” and “Frigididesulfovibrio” ) besides the existing genera. Reorganizing the confusing taxonomy of the Desulfovibrionaceae family was completed by adding two valid [ Macrodesulfovibrio ( Galushko and Kuever, 2020b ), Oceanidesulfovibrio ( Galushko and Kuever, 2020c )] and one invalid genera [“ Psychrodesulfovibrio ” ( Galushko and Kuever, 2020d )] at the end of 2020 through Bergey’s manual ( Galushko and Kuever, 2020a ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of the characteristics of strain FSS-1 T with those of the reference strains Strains: 1, FSS-1 T ; 2, Fundidesulfovibrio putealis B7-43 T [64]; 3, Fundidesulfovibrio butyratiphilus BSY T[65]; 4, Desulfolutivibrio sulfoxidireducens DSM 107105 T[57]; 5, Desulfolutivibrio sulfodismutans ThAc01 T[66]; 6, Solidesulfovibrio magneticus RS-1 T[22]. +, Positive reaction; (+), weakly positive reaction; −, negative reaction; nd, not determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%