2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.adt.2017.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed illustration of the accuracy of currently used nuclear-mass models

Abstract: The accuracy of description of measured nuclear masses by presently used nuclear-mass models is studied. Twelve models of various kinds are considered, eleven of the global character and one local model specially adapted to description of heavy nuclei. To decrease the number of nuclei over which the accuracy is averaged, the global region (Z, N ≥ 8) is divided into four subregions, in which the accuracy is studied separately. Still, to reach the best precision, the accuracy is finally investigated without any … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 shows that the new experimental S α data can be well described by the latest version of FRDM ′ 12 [49] and WS4 [50] mass models. The latter has been found to be the most accurate model in various mass regions [51,52]. We note, that the extrapolated S α ( 84 Mo) agrees well with the prediction by the WS4 model.…”
Section: Rp-processsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…3 shows that the new experimental S α data can be well described by the latest version of FRDM ′ 12 [49] and WS4 [50] mass models. The latter has been found to be the most accurate model in various mass regions [51,52]. We note, that the extrapolated S α ( 84 Mo) agrees well with the prediction by the WS4 model.…”
Section: Rp-processsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Thus, the neutron dripline in the medium and heavy mass regions is located many dozens neutron numbers away off the valley of β-stability and with high certainty will not be experimentally reached in the next several decades. Presently the only possibility to get a clue about an approximate location of the neutron dripline is the consideration of the trend of the neutron separation energies calculated for all nuclides with measured masses and the extrapolation of this trend to S n =0 employing various mass formulas (Sobiczewski et al 2018). In this approach high-precision mass measurements with a few 10 keV/c 2 uncertainty on all experimentally reachable nuclides become mandatory.…”
Section: Mass Spectrometry On Radioactive Ions Nuclear Structure Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27,16]. Different nuclear mass models vary in their success in describing experimentally known nuclear masses [28]. Hence, a comprehensive study of the sensitivity of r-process nucleosynthesis to individual nuclear masses was carried out in Refs.…”
Section: Theoretical Nuclear Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%