2008
DOI: 10.1364/oe.16.016632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed investigation of self-imaging in largecore multimode optical fibers for application in fiber lasers and amplifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4(a) and 4(b). It should be noted that achieving 100% perfect self-imaging (the normalized power is equal to 1) is impossible due to phase mismatches [36]. These features are consistent with the results in [34], [35], indicating that an explicit self-imaging of the input field is formed and the self-imaging period LZ for SNCS is equal to 58.64 mm.…”
Section: B the Self-imaging Periodssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4(a) and 4(b). It should be noted that achieving 100% perfect self-imaging (the normalized power is equal to 1) is impossible due to phase mismatches [36]. These features are consistent with the results in [34], [35], indicating that an explicit self-imaging of the input field is formed and the self-imaging period LZ for SNCS is equal to 58.64 mm.…”
Section: B the Self-imaging Periodssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The degree of deviation (the difference between Dn and 'round (Dn)') may be attributed to two reasons: one is the errors in the calculations of the effective index by the graphical method; the other is the phase mismatches among the excited modes, which always exist although they are quite small [36]. The 100% perfect selfimaging is impossible due to phase mismatches [36], therefore 100% integer may be also impossible.…”
Section: Exploration Of the Discrete Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multimode interference (MMI) has been successfully explored in various fiber optic applications in beam shapers, sensors, and filters [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. In a multimode fiber, different guided modes have different phase velocities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The period of oscillations in Fig. 1(b) is given by Λ ¼ ffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi 2Δ p πR=ðδ × LÞ, where Λ is inversely proportional to L [6]. In Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general cases where nonlinear effects need to be considered, the phase shifts introduced by self‐phase modulation (SPM) and cross‐phase modulation (XPM) effects will change the self‐imaging beat length in GIMF varying the power coupling efficiency of the light from GIMF to SMF, which reveals the temporal intensity discrimination required for mode‐locking. The multimode light field distribution EnormalMMfalse(r,,zfalse) along the GIMF can be expressed as: [ 28–30 ] EnormalMMr,,z=eiβ1zn=1NCnenr,,zei(βnβ1)zCn is the mode expansion coefficient, β 1 and βn are the propagation constants of fundamental mode and the n th excited mode respectively. When the length of GIMF meets odd integer times of the half beat length, L=false(m/2false)Lselfimaging ( m is an odd integer), the condition of the intensity discrimination can be satisfied, [ 24 ] Hence, all the modes satisfy ΔβnL=mπ, Δβn=βiβj, Δneff,n=false(βiβjfalse)λ0/2π, which can be written as: Δneff,nL=m2λ0λ 0 is the central wavelength, L is the length of GIMF.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%