2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11915-1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting and Correcting Conservativity Principle Violations in Ontology-to-Ontology Mappings

Abstract: Abstract. In order to enable interoperability between ontology-based systems, ontology matching techniques have been proposed. However, when the generated mappings suffer from logical flaws, their usefulness may be diminished. In this paper we present an approximate method to detect and correct violations to the so-called conservativity principle where novel subsumption entailments between named concepts in one of the input ontologies are considered as unwanted. We show that this is indeed the case in our appl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a motivating examp le we modify and adapt an example described in [23] Table 2 between O 1 and O 2 generated by an off-the-shelf ontology align ment system. As described in Section 2, mappings are represented as 5-tuples; for example the mapping m 1 suggests an equivalence relat ionship between the entities O 1 :Well and O 2 :Well, with confidence 0.9.…”
Section: ) Motivating Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a motivating examp le we modify and adapt an example described in [23] Table 2 between O 1 and O 2 generated by an off-the-shelf ontology align ment system. As described in Section 2, mappings are represented as 5-tuples; for example the mapping m 1 suggests an equivalence relat ionship between the entities O 1 :Well and O 2 :Well, with confidence 0.9.…”
Section: ) Motivating Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conservativity principle has been identified for instance in [13] as an align ment wh ich allo ws the interaction between ontologies, rather than providing a new description of the do main. However, [23] proposes a different variant of the conservativity principle where the integrated ontology O u must not introduce new subsumption relationships between concepts within the input ontologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this purpose we extended an existing ontology alignment system LogMap [12] that aligns two ontologies O 1 and O 2 by deriving equivalence and subclass(property) assertions between the terms from O 1 's and O 2 's vocabularies using the lexical characteristics of the terms and the structure of the ontologies. Our extension [27] Layering. Our layering procedure uses a novel technique for the semi-automatic discovery of direct mappings between O and D by performing string matching of O and D's schemata enhanced with their structural comparison [20].…”
Section: Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alignment outputs a set of pairs of matched terms together with a score showing how well they match. For this purpose we extended the ontology alignment system LogMap [27], that can perform both syntactic and structural matching of ontologies, so that it also can perform the required alignment of ontologies and query catalogues. The main challenge was to define the notion of a structural neighbourhood of a query term in a set of conjunctive queries.…”
Section: Assessing the Quality Of Our Obda Deploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%