2011 International Conference on Body Sensor Networks 2011
DOI: 10.1109/bsn.2011.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting and Rectifying Anomalies in Body Sensor Networks

Abstract: Abstract-Activity recognition using onbody sensors are prone to degradation due to changes on sensor readings. The changes can occur because of degradation or alteration in the behavior of the sensor with respect to the others. In this paper we propose a method which detects anomalous nodes in the network and takes compensatory actions to keep the performance of the system as high as possible while the system is running. We show on two activity datasets with different configurations of onbody sensors that dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such measure can be used to infer an online estimation of the system reliability, a critical point for systems that have to deal with dynamic changing environments [13,21]. For example, if a sensor is considered non reliable (e.g., when the estimated shift Θ exceeds a given threshold), compensatory actions can be taken, such as its removal from a sensor network [13,23,22]. Figure 10 shows how the mean and standard deviation of the estimated shift correlates with the change in performance with respect to the original location, for both sensor displacement and rotation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such measure can be used to infer an online estimation of the system reliability, a critical point for systems that have to deal with dynamic changing environments [13,21]. For example, if a sensor is considered non reliable (e.g., when the estimated shift Θ exceeds a given threshold), compensatory actions can be taken, such as its removal from a sensor network [13,23,22]. Figure 10 shows how the mean and standard deviation of the estimated shift correlates with the change in performance with respect to the original location, for both sensor displacement and rotation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers also propose top down, application-level methods to detect sensor faults [19,28]. The principle is to look at how sensor failure affects reasoners.…”
Section: Detection Techniques In Smart Home Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these systems, one inevitable anomaly is the rotation or sliding of the sensors. If these anomalies can be detected, it is easier to take an appropriate counter-action for the misbehaving sensor, without the need of reconfiguring the whole system (Sagha et al, 2011a;Chavarriaga et al, 2011). This desirable characteristic is the core feature of Opportunistic activity recognition systems where elements in the network may appear, disappear or change during life time .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%