2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2015.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting changes in maps of gamma spectra with Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests

Abstract: Various security, regulatory, and consequence management agencies are interested in continuously monitoring wide areas for unexpected changes in radioactivity. Existing detection systems are designed to search for radioactive sources but are not suited to repeat mapping and change detection. Using a set of daily spectral observations collected at the Pickle Research Campus, we improved on the prior Spectral Comparison Ratio Anomaly Mapping (scram) algorithm and developed a new method based on two-sample Kolmog… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solid grey lines show the ROC curve when using a global (spatially invariant) estimate of the spectral density. The dotted grey lines show the ROC curves using the two-sample KS test described in Reinhart et al (2015), which also adapts spatially but does not involve any spatial smoothing. In all panels, the horizontal axis (FPR, false positive rate) is shown on a log scale, while the vertical axis (TPR, true positive rate) is shown on an ordinary scale.…”
Section: Further Details Of Bayesian Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The solid grey lines show the ROC curve when using a global (spatially invariant) estimate of the spectral density. The dotted grey lines show the ROC curves using the two-sample KS test described in Reinhart et al (2015), which also adapts spatially but does not involve any spatial smoothing. In all panels, the horizontal axis (FPR, false positive rate) is shown on a log scale, while the vertical axis (TPR, true positive rate) is shown on an ordinary scale.…”
Section: Further Details Of Bayesian Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to decide whether a simulatedx (s) is an anomaly, we use a one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test comparing the empirical energy CDF ofx (s) to the CDF of the estimated background spectrum at site s. This is identical to the method of Chan et al (2014) with overdispersion parameter φ = 1; the generalization to other overdispersion parameters would be straightforward in principle, although we do not explore this. 2 To establish that spatial disaggregation and smoothing can improve matters, we benchmarked our method against two others:(1) The one-sample KS/Chan et al (2014) test using the global estimate of the background as the reference distribution.(2) The two-sample KS test of Reinhart et al (2015), where "sample 1" comprises the training observations from site s, and "sample 2" is the simulatedx (s) .2 Note that the authors of Chan et al (2014) simply assume that the background is known. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e Bernoulli process and Markov chain [34,35] were used on all network users, with mean values of [0.63, 0.48], respectively, and a threshold of 0.05, to get a better understanding of the messaging patterns and their variability. is phase monitors the activities of anomalous nodes as a group.…”
Section: Privacy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It accepts the hypothesis that the distributions are equal if D KS is less than a threshold value D T , which is determined by choosing a significance level [17,18]. The method has been previously and successfully applied to compare gamma spectra [19]. The function determining D T for a given significance level assumes that both cumulative distribution functions are samples of the exact same parent distribution.…”
Section: Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%