Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Multimedia and Security 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1411328.1411334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting digital audio forgeries by checking frame offsets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yang et al [19] presented an interesting approach for detecting digital audio forgeries mainly in MP3. Using a passive approach, they are able to detect doctored MP3 audio by checking frame offsets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yang et al [19] presented an interesting approach for detecting digital audio forgeries mainly in MP3. Using a passive approach, they are able to detect doctored MP3 audio by checking frame offsets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using an unsupervised SOM to reduce the dimensionality of PC values, we introduce an offset rule similar to that presented in [19] to detect compromised programs. Thus using machine learning techniques [22] we are able to determine whether two PC values are similar to each other, with the use of the program binaries [21] and no prior knowledge of the source code.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of statistical features of zero MDCT coefficients and nonzero MDCT coefficients from the frequency range as well as individual scale bands are adopted. In [5,6], a forgery detection method for MP3 audio files is proposed. Based on the observation that forgeries break the original frame segmentation, frame offsets are used to locate forgeries automatically, allowing to detect most common forgeries, such http://jis.eurasipjournals.com/content/2014/1/10 as deletion, insertion, substitution, and splicing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. Time-domain analysis based methods [25][26][27][28][29] have also been proposed to determine authenticity of digital audio recordings by capturing traces of lossy compression using encoder frame offsets in time domain [25][26][27] or detecting traces of "butt-splicing" in the digital recording using higher-order time-differences and correlation analysis [28]. http://www.security-informatics.com/content/3/1/11…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%