2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1735168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Earnings Management: A New Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
696
1
92

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 443 publications
(818 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
21
696
1
92
Order By: Relevance
“…The first models known for identification of EM through discretionary accruals (accrual total -accruals non-discretionary) are DeAngelo (1986) and Healy (1985), which might explain the prominence of positivist theory (Watts & Zimmerman, 1986) during this period. However, it was in the 90s that EM studies of with this approach proliferated, highlighting the models proposed by Jones (1991); Dechow, Sloan, and Sweeney (1995), known as Jones (1991) modified;and Kang and Sivaramakrishnan (1995). Since the proposition of these models, several studies have adopted them to identify EM practices and/or motivational factors associated to them in, different countries or groups of countries, especially: (i) Jones (1991) Kang and Sivaramakrishnan (1995) model -e.g.…”
Section: Mcnicholsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first models known for identification of EM through discretionary accruals (accrual total -accruals non-discretionary) are DeAngelo (1986) and Healy (1985), which might explain the prominence of positivist theory (Watts & Zimmerman, 1986) during this period. However, it was in the 90s that EM studies of with this approach proliferated, highlighting the models proposed by Jones (1991); Dechow, Sloan, and Sweeney (1995), known as Jones (1991) modified;and Kang and Sivaramakrishnan (1995). Since the proposition of these models, several studies have adopted them to identify EM practices and/or motivational factors associated to them in, different countries or groups of countries, especially: (i) Jones (1991) Kang and Sivaramakrishnan (1995) model -e.g.…”
Section: Mcnicholsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McNichols (2000); Kothari, Leone, and Wasley (2005). Several also the proposed modifications to these models, mostly with the inclusion of variables in the model originally proposed by Jones (1991) and modified by Dechow, Sloan, and Sweeney (1995).…”
Section: Mcnicholsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kothari model (Kothari et al, 2005) Following Jones (1991) and Dechow et al (1995), total accrual adjustments (TAA) are defined as:…”
Section: Appendix 1 Measure Of Earnings Management Through Discretionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pressupõe-se que o desempenho da empresa quando medido pelo indicador ROA está positivamente relacionado ao gerenciamento de resultados (Dechow, Sloan & Sweeney, 1995), pois empresas com melhores retornos sobre seus ativos possuem menores níveis de gerenciamento de resultados (Burgstahler, Hail & Leuz, 2006), assim como também aquelas que possuem melhores retornos sobre o patrimônio líquido. Diante disso, espera-se verificar o mesmo comportamento para o desempenho em relação ao gerenciamento de resultados por meio da conta de provisão para garantias.…”
Section: Aspectos Metodológicos Do Estudounclassified
“…Existem diversos modelos de gerenciamento de resultados com estimação dos accruals discricionários, como, por exemplo, Healy (1985), Jones (1991), Jones Modificado (Dechow et al, 1995), KS (Kang & Sivaramakrishnan, 1995) e Pae (2005) (Melo & Paulo, 2011). Porém, existem também outras abordagens para analisar o comportamento discricionário dos accruals, como, por exemplo, a análise de accruals específicos (Martinez, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified