2020
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2020.1862854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting emotion faces in a Posner’s spatial cueing task: the adaptive value of surprise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is contrary to our hypothesis that regular nondisordered poker players would display higher information attention abilities compared to controls for the types of emotion that may be useful is the context of poker, i.e., joy, sadness, and surprise. Indeed, the processing efficiency hypothesis ( Calvo, Avero, & Lundqvist, 2006 ; Gordillo León, Mestas Hernández, Pérez Nieto, & Arana Martínez, 2021 ) postulates that negative stimuli (especially fear) is processed more efficiently than neutral or positive stimuli to react more quickly. For example, in studies regarding spatial attention, fear is the main emotion that is known to automatically capture attention ( Bannerman, Milders, de Gelder, & Sahraie, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is contrary to our hypothesis that regular nondisordered poker players would display higher information attention abilities compared to controls for the types of emotion that may be useful is the context of poker, i.e., joy, sadness, and surprise. Indeed, the processing efficiency hypothesis ( Calvo, Avero, & Lundqvist, 2006 ; Gordillo León, Mestas Hernández, Pérez Nieto, & Arana Martínez, 2021 ) postulates that negative stimuli (especially fear) is processed more efficiently than neutral or positive stimuli to react more quickly. For example, in studies regarding spatial attention, fear is the main emotion that is known to automatically capture attention ( Bannerman, Milders, de Gelder, & Sahraie, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%