2009
DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2009.23.1.62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Individuals With Borderline Personality Disorder in the Community: An Ascertainment Strategy and Comparison With a Hospital Sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
10
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, in order to successfully intervene in the transgenerational transmission of abuse, early and targeted intervention to address those personality characteristics that create risk for both the caregiver and the child is essential. Similar to other studies of females with BPD in the community (Korfine and Hooley, ), the current sample did not demonstrate the severity of self‐injury and adaptive functioning deficits commonly observed amongst females in secure settings. Treatment for those with BPD who come to the attention of child protection services might be better to focus on interpersonal dysfunction and emotional dysregulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…First, in order to successfully intervene in the transgenerational transmission of abuse, early and targeted intervention to address those personality characteristics that create risk for both the caregiver and the child is essential. Similar to other studies of females with BPD in the community (Korfine and Hooley, ), the current sample did not demonstrate the severity of self‐injury and adaptive functioning deficits commonly observed amongst females in secure settings. Treatment for those with BPD who come to the attention of child protection services might be better to focus on interpersonal dysfunction and emotional dysregulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Likewise, the correlations found suggested a high degree of overlap between these constructs. Previous studies have found that participants with high scores in self-reports assessing BPD traits present higher levels of depressive symptomatology, negative affect, distress, emotional dysregulation, and psychopathological symptoms (Gardner & Qualter, 2009a;Korfine & Hooley, 2009;Leung & Leung, 2009;Trull, 1995). Paralleling this trend, studies carried out in patients with BPD also found affective and psychopathological alterations and high rates of comorbidity (Becker et al, 2006;Johansen et al, 2004;McGlashan et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Along this continuum we might encounter intermediate phenotypic expressions, which, though not reaching clinical level, would be associated with greater current psychopathological intensity, severity and impairment, and possibly with higher risk of future development of psychopathological disorders. In this regard, participants with high scores on self-reports assessing BPD traits or with subclinical levels have been linked with more depressive symptomatology, negative affect, distress, emotional dysregulation, psychopathological symptoms, and BPD diagnosis (Gardner & Qualter, 2009a;Korfine & Hooley, 2009;Leung & Leung, 2009;Trull, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings are, however, limited by a number of methodological weaknesses: (1) a proportion of the study utilized retrospective data, which has been argued to be subject to distortions of memory (Campbell & Porter, ); (2) the cross‐sectional design, which does not permit any causal conclusions to be made ( note : the model of reverse causation was not statistically viable, which provides support for the validity of our findings); (3) the use of self‐report measures, which creates the likelihood for biassed data and inflated relationships through common method variance; and (4) the high prevalence of threshold BPD symptoms (26.3%), which is atypical of most studies and may suggest a sample bias or that the PDQ‐4‐BPD subscale resulted in a high number of false positives. The prevalence reported in our study could be related to a common limitation of all volunteer participant recruitment drives, self‐selection (Korfine & Hooley, ). The advertisement used to recruit participants referred to ‘how childhood events and current relationships affect adult personality.’ Hence, individuals who perceived themselves to have difficulties in these areas might have shown a greater interest in participating.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%