2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-017-1399-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting long-term occupancy changes in Californian odonates from natural history and citizen science records

Abstract: In a world of rapid environmental change, effective biodiversity conservation and management relies on our ability to detect changes in species occurrence. While long-term, standardized monitoring is ideal for detecting change, such monitoring is costly and rare. An alternative approach is to use historical records from natural history collections as a baseline to compare with recent observations. Here, we combine natural history collection data with citizen science observations within a hierarchical Bayesian … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, since some citizen scientists are active year-round, CS data also tend to capture a larger proportion of the biological community, including rare species, than standardized data (Bradter et al 2018). As CS data has become more accessible, there has been simultaneous development of methods to analyze such data (van Strien et al 2013;Isaac et al 2014;Rapacciuolo et al 2017). Occupancy-detection models have emerged as one approach that is robust to different ways citizen scientists collect data, by explicitly modelling heterogeneity in survey effort and species detectability (Isaac et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, since some citizen scientists are active year-round, CS data also tend to capture a larger proportion of the biological community, including rare species, than standardized data (Bradter et al 2018). As CS data has become more accessible, there has been simultaneous development of methods to analyze such data (van Strien et al 2013;Isaac et al 2014;Rapacciuolo et al 2017). Occupancy-detection models have emerged as one approach that is robust to different ways citizen scientists collect data, by explicitly modelling heterogeneity in survey effort and species detectability (Isaac et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such data and collaboration frameworks have been called for since at least the 1990s (e.g., Davis, 1995). There are many recent examples of frameworks that integrate biological data and museum specimen collections with publicly available scientific data such as climate scenarios, land use, and remotely sensed imagery, and provide tools to promote visualization and in-depth analysis (e.g., Abbott and Broglie, 2005;Beaman and Cellinese, 2012;Rapacciuolo et al, 2017). The EcoEngine is one example of this kind of framework designed to address climate and land cover and land use change which span spatial and temporal dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the application of hierarchical occupancy models to museum specimens and historical observations can vastly improve our estimates of the influence of selection on assemblages at the centennial scale (Tingley and Beissinger 2009, Tingley et al 2012, Iknayan et al 2014, Rapacciuolo et al 2017, Zeilinger et al 2017. For instance, the application of hierarchical occupancy models to museum specimens and historical observations can vastly improve our estimates of the influence of selection on assemblages at the centennial scale (Tingley and Beissinger 2009, Tingley et al 2012, Iknayan et al 2014, Rapacciuolo et al 2017, Zeilinger et al 2017.…”
Section: Hierarchical Occupancy Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to their ability to account for different types of sampling bias, occupancy models are also becoming key to modeling longer-term data sources. For instance, the application of hierarchical occupancy models to museum specimens and historical observations can vastly improve our estimates of the influence of selection on assemblages at the centennial scale (Tingley and Beissinger 2009, Tingley et al 2012, Iknayan et al 2014, Rapacciuolo et al 2017, Zeilinger et al 2017. Although different approaches have traditionally been preferred to account for imperfect detection in paleoecological data (Alroy et al 2001, Sugita 2007a, b, Pirzamanbein et al 2014, hierarchical occupancy models are beginning to be applied to the fossil record for assemblage-level inference (Liow 2013).…”
Section: Hierarchical Occupancy Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%