Understanding ecological change across large spatial, temporal and taxonomic scales: integrating data and methods in light of theory

Abstract

Ecography E4 awardThe difficulty of integrating multiple theories, data and methods has slowed progress towards making unified inferences of ecological change generalizable across large spatial, temporal and taxonomic scales. However, recent progress towards a theoretical synthesis now provides a guiding framework for organizing and integrating all primary data and methods for spatiotemporal assemblage-level inference in ecology. In this paper, we describe how recent theoretical developments can provide an organizing paradigm for linking advances in data collection and methodological frameworks across disparate ecological sub-disciplines and across large spatial and temporal scales. First, we summarize the set of fundamental processes that determine change in multispecies assemblages across spatial and temporal scales by reviewing recent theoretical syntheses of community ecology. Second, we review recent advances in data and methods across the main sub-disciplines concerned with ecological inference across large spatial, temporal and taxonomic scales, and organize them based on the primary fundamental processes they include, rather than the spatiotemporal scale of their inferences. Finally, we highlight how iteratively focusing on only one fundamental process at a time, but combining all relevant spatiotemporal data and methods, may reduce the conceptual challenges to integration among ecological sub-disciplines. Moreover, we discuss a number of avenues for decreasing the practical barriers to integration among data and methods. We aim to reconcile the recent convergence of decades of thinking in community ecology and macroecology theory with the rapid progress in spatiotemporal approaches for assemblage-level inference, at a time where a robust understanding of spatiotemporal change in ecological assemblages is more crucial than ever to conserve biodiversity.

How can social–ecological system models simulate the emergence of social–ecological crises?

“…Focusing on a few key fundamental processes that span scales and contexts, and omitting other less general or important dynamics, is an approach that has had significant success in community ecology. This approach emphasises understanding the nature and effects of these fundamental processes, in isolation if necessary, as sufficient for capturing the effects of numerous sub-processes without accounting for them directly (Rapacciuolo & Blois, 2019). In community ecology, Vellend (2010) argued that myriad processes belong to one of four fundamental 'high-level' processes-drift, speciation, dispersal and selection-that together produce observed patterns in the composition and diversity of species across timescales.…”

Editorial: Ecological Non-equilibrium in the Anthropocene

“…Via this approach, Sandel finds that using 5-or 10-year averages of climate frequently increases the explanatory power of the climate trend compared to 1-year averages, particularly in birds. The analyses of Gaüzère et al and Sandel show that this new wealth of large-scale ecological data, coupled with fundamental advances in the analytical ability to model such information and account for biases in each datum type (Rapacciuolo and Blois, 2019), now enable tackling questions about scale that had traditionally proved a challenge for ecologists. Sustained progress in this direction will require increasing integration among empirical approaches and data types-particularly between deep-and near-time approaches (Price and Schmitz, 2016;Pearse et al, 2018).…”

Pitfalls of ignoring trait resolution when drawing conclusions about ecological processes

“…For over a century, explaining how communities are assembled has been a fundamental pursuit in ecology. An understanding of community assembly is important for formulating general rules in ecology, but also for gaining insight into the mechanisms of biodiversity change and its cascading effects on ecosystem functions, an increasingly urgent need (Jarzyna & Jetz, 2017; Park & Razafindratsima, 2019; Rapacciuolo & Blois, 2019). The dominant paradigm of community assembly is an integrative model that asserts that abiotic, biotic and dispersal filters allow or prohibit species from a regional species pool to enter a local community (Götzenberger et al., 2012; Münkemüller et al., 2020).…”