2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.03.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Phishing Websites via Aggregation Analysis of Page Layouts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that the multidimensional feature algorithm significantly improves the accuracy and reduces FPR, FNR and cost compared with CNN-LSTM and the traditional feature extraction method. Table 5 illustrates the three metrics of MFPD and other approaches (Mao et al [11], CANTINA+ [19], Bahnse et al [32]) based on the evaluation value in the papers. In order to facilitate comparison, we calculate the three metrics based on our experiment results.…”
Section: Experiments On the Multidimensional Feature Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen that the multidimensional feature algorithm significantly improves the accuracy and reduces FPR, FNR and cost compared with CNN-LSTM and the traditional feature extraction method. Table 5 illustrates the three metrics of MFPD and other approaches (Mao et al [11], CANTINA+ [19], Bahnse et al [32]) based on the evaluation value in the papers. In order to facilitate comparison, we calculate the three metrics based on our experiment results.…”
Section: Experiments On the Multidimensional Feature Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is that malicious URLs or phishing webpages have some characteristics that can be distinguished from legitimate websites, and machine learning can be effective in this regard for processing. Current mainstream machine learning methods of phishing website detection extract statistical features from the URL and the host [10] or extract relevant features of the webpage, such as the layout, CSS, text [11], [12], and then classify these features. However, these methods only analyze the URL or extract features from a single perspective, which makes it difficult to extract the complete attributes of phishing websites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors in Mao et al [ 44 ] proposed a learning-based system to choose page design comparability used to distinguish phishing attack pages. for effective page layout features, they characterized the guidelines and build up a phishing page classifier with two conventional learning-algorithms, SVM and DT.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only bad email classification, but phishing webpage classification is also a popular research applied with machine learn-ing. Mao et al [8] proposed a learning-based aggregation analysis mechanism to determine the similarity of page layouts and detect phishing pages. Their approach automatically trains classifiers to determine web page similarity from CSS layout features, without requiring a human expert.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%