2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Sirex noctilio grey-attacked and lightning-struck pine trees using airborne hyperspectral data, random forest and support vector machines classifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
84
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VI is calculated for each waveband, used for node splitting at a given tree, and then averaged across all trees to produce the final VI per waveband [30]. Similar to [23,24], the top 10% (p = 18) of the ranked waveband importance as determined by RF and XGBoost was used to create a subset of important wavebands. RF and XGBoost models were produced for both the original dataset and the subset of 18 wavebands.…”
Section: Dimensionality Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VI is calculated for each waveband, used for node splitting at a given tree, and then averaged across all trees to produce the final VI per waveband [30]. Similar to [23,24], the top 10% (p = 18) of the ranked waveband importance as determined by RF and XGBoost was used to create a subset of important wavebands. RF and XGBoost models were produced for both the original dataset and the subset of 18 wavebands.…”
Section: Dimensionality Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore expected that bands in the visible portion of the EMS were found to be more useful for feature and land cover class discrimination [26]. The SWIR region of the EMS could have been useful for discriminating different flowering plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the dimensionality of hyperspectral features might not be captured in a linear projection. Therefore, non-linear classification methods such as random forest, that produce variable selection as a by-product during the learning process, are considered efficient algorithms for the analyses of hyperspectral data especially in biomes where spectral mixing is highly non-linear (e.g., [21][22][23][24][25][26]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random forest (RF) classifier (Breiman, 2001), have been developed and produced promising results in mapping forest health conditions and extracting forest structure parameters (Dye et al, 2012;Grinand et al, 2013;Abdel-Rahman et al, 2014). Since the textural and local spatial information has the potential to improving the accuracy of class designation by minimizing intra-class variation (Lé vesque and King, 2003;Wulder and Boots, 1998), the overall objective of this study is to assess whether the GLCM and Gi features extracted from IKONOS imagery were effective in determining Robinia pseudoacacia forest health conditions in the YRD, China using RF classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%