2005
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2005.848368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Stress During Real-World Driving Tasks Using Physiological Sensors

Abstract: This paper presents methods for collecting and analyzing physiological data during real world driving tasks to determine a driver's relative stress level. Electrocardiogram, electromyogram, skin conductance and respiration were recorded continuously while drivers followed a set route through open roads in the greater Boston area. Data from twenty-four drives of at least fifty minute duration were collected f or analysis. In Analysis I features from five minute intervals of data were used to distinguish three l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
1,233
6
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,683 publications
(1,273 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
24
1,233
6
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The increment of the average EDA during recovery over the average EDA during baseline was labeled "EDA Change: Recovery minus Baseline," and was used as proxy marker for prolonged, sympathetic arousal following stressful stimulation. This procedure follows previous EDA studies with baseline, stress, and/or recovery conditions (Healey and Picard, 2005;El-Sheikh et al 2007;Reinhardt et al, 2012).…”
Section: Electrodermal Activity (Eda) Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increment of the average EDA during recovery over the average EDA during baseline was labeled "EDA Change: Recovery minus Baseline," and was used as proxy marker for prolonged, sympathetic arousal following stressful stimulation. This procedure follows previous EDA studies with baseline, stress, and/or recovery conditions (Healey and Picard, 2005;El-Sheikh et al 2007;Reinhardt et al, 2012).…”
Section: Electrodermal Activity (Eda) Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Healey and Picard measured drivers' stress reactions by monitoring multiple physiological signals, such as ECG, GSR, electromyogram (EMG), and respiration in a prescheduled route setting [10]. They used 5-minute intervals of data during the rest, highway, and city driving conditions to distinguish between three levels of driver stress.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physiological features have been extracted from signals like electrocardiogram (ECG / EKG), electromyogram (EMG), galvanic skin response (GSR), respiration and electrocardiogram (EKG / ECG) and classified for detecting stress level or emotions of automotive drivers [5,6,7] . The mostly used physiological parameters have been (a) heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV), both derived from ECG and (b) skin conductance responses (SCR) and other related features which account for sudden stress responses, derived from GSR.…”
Section: Physiological Signals Sensors and Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The salient features of our stress level detection approach includes: (a) first work to the best of our knowledge focusing a developing country like India in terms of scenario design, subject population and road settings, (b) physiological data collected in realtime driving scenarios modeled the stress contributing factors into a multiclass problem instead of a binary class 9 , (c) an exhaustive set of physiological features (39 statistical, syntactic and spectral) were extracted representing driver's current physiological state, (d) instead of less number of subjects and a one-fold classification [6][7] , we used more subjects and performed analysis on single as well multi-turn drive data, and (e) six neural network 4-class classifiers were evaluated instead of generalizing a single classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%