2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting the Community Structure and Activity Patterns of Temporal Networks: A Non-Negative Tensor Factorization Approach

Abstract: The increasing availability of temporal network data is calling for more research on extracting and characterizing mesoscopic structures in temporal networks and on relating such structure to specific functions or properties of the system. An outstanding challenge is the extension of the results achieved for static networks to time-varying networks, where the topological structure of the system and the temporal activity patterns of its components are intertwined. Here we investigate the use of a latent factor … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
184
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
184
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to their multiple dimensions, tensors are suitable objects to represent multimodal data [25]. This allows to identify correlation in the data at different levels [26]: on the one hand, the application of the NTF helps in the identification of hidden topological structures in the data, like groups or communities, which are easy to interpret as they reflect individuals' social dynamics [27]. On the other hand, these topological structures share correlated activity patterns [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to their multiple dimensions, tensors are suitable objects to represent multimodal data [25]. This allows to identify correlation in the data at different levels [26]: on the one hand, the application of the NTF helps in the identification of hidden topological structures in the data, like groups or communities, which are easy to interpret as they reflect individuals' social dynamics [27]. On the other hand, these topological structures share correlated activity patterns [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-world OSNs, however, are definitely not static. The networks formed in services such as Twitter undergo major and rapid changes over time, which places them in the field of dynamic networks (Asur, Parthasarathy & Ucar, 2007;Palla, Barabasi & Vicsek, 2007;Takaffoli et al, 2011;Tantipathananandh, Berger-Wolf & Kempe, 2007;Roy Chowdhury & Sukumar, 2014;Gauvin, Panisson & Cattuto, 2014;Greene, Doyle & Cunningham, 2010;Aktunc et al, 2015;Albano, Guillaume & Le Grand, 2014). These changes are manifested as users join in or leave one or more communities, by friends mentioning each other to attract attention or by new users referencing a total stranger.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dynamic community is formed by a temporal array of the aforementioned communities with the condition that they share common users (Cazabet & Amblard, 2014;Nguyen et al, 2014). Community evolution detection has been previously used to study the temporal structure of a network (Gauvin, Panisson & Cattuto, 2014;Greene, Doyle & Cunningham, 2010;Palla, Barabasi & Vicsek, 2007;Takaffoli et al, 2011). However, even by establishing only the communities that sustain interest over time, the amount of communities and thus metadata that a user has to scan through is immense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asur et al [19] developed a framework for capturing and identifying community events which are used to characterize complex behavioral patterns of individuals and communities over time. Gauvin et al [20] used the non-negative tensor factorization method to extract the community activities of dynamic networks. Wang [21] found that community merging depends largely on the clustering coefficient of the nodes connecting two communities directly, while community splitting depends on the clustering coefficient of the nodes in the community for social networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%