The Triple Collocation (TC) technique allows the simultaneous calibration of three independent, collocated data sources, while providing an estimate of their accuracy. In this study, the TC is adapted to validate different salinity data products along the tropical band. The representativeness error (the true variance resolved by the relatively high-resolution systems but not by the relatively low-resolution system) is accounted for in the validation process. A method based on the intercalibration capabilities of TC is used to estimate the representativeness error for each triplet, which is found to impact between 15% and 50% the error estimation of the different products. The method also sorts the different products in terms of their resolving spatio-temporal scales. The six salinity products (sorted from smaller to larger scales) used here are: the in-situ data from the Global Tropical Moored Buoy Array (TAO), the GLORYS2V3 ocean reanalysis output provided by Copernicus, the satellite-derived Aquarius Level 3 version 4 (AV4) and SMOS Objectively Analyzed (SOA) maps, and the climatology maps provided by the World Ocean Atlas (WOA). This validation approach aims to assess the quality of the different salinity products at the satellite-resolved spatiotemporal scales. The results in the tropics for 2013 show that, at the AV4 resolved scales, the Aquarius product has an error of 0.17, and outperforms TAO, GLORYS2V3 and the SMOS Objectively Analysis maps (SOA). However, at the SOA resolved scales (which are coarser than those of the Aquarius product because of the large OA correlation radii used), the SMOS product has an error of 0.20, slightly lower than that of GLORYS2V3, Aquarius, and TAO. The WOA products show the highest errors. Higher order calibration may lead to a more accurate assessment of the quality of the climatological products.